RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 506.Where special proceeding commenced.

Article 5. Venue · Last amended 2024 · Last verified July 21, 2026

In one sentenceCPLR 506 sets venue for a special proceeding — ordinarily any county in the judicial district where it's triable — and lists detailed venue rules for proceedings against a body or officer, including agencies that must be sued in Albany County and a rule for apportionment challenges.

Full Text of CPLR 506

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(a) Generally. Unless otherwise prescribed in subdivision (b) or in the law authorizing the proceeding, a special proceeding may be commenced in any county within the judicial district where the proceeding is triable.
(b) Proceeding against body or officer. A proceeding against a body or officer shall be commenced in any county within the judicial district where the respondent made the determination complained of or refused to perform the duty specifically enjoined upon him by law, or where the proceedings were brought or taken in the course of which the matter sought to be restrained originated, or where the material events otherwise took place, or where the principal office of the respondent is located, except that 1. a proceeding against a justice of the supreme court or a judge of a county court or the court of general sessions shall be commenced in the appellate division in the judicial department where the action, in the course of which the matter sought to be enforced or restrained originated, is triable, unless a term of the appellate division in that department is not in session, in which case the proceeding may be commenced in the appellate division in an adjoining judicial department; and 2. a proceeding against the regents of the university of the state of New York, the commissioner of education, the commissioner of taxation and finance, the tax appeals tribunal except as provided in section two thousand sixteen of the tax law, the public service commission, the commissioner or the department of transportation relating to articles three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine or ten of the transportation law or to the railroad law, the water resources board, the comptroller or the department of agriculture and markets, shall be commenced in the supreme court, Albany county.
3. notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph two of this subdivision, a proceeding against the commissioner of education pursuant to section forty-four hundred four of the education law may be commenced in the supreme court in the county of residence of the petitioner.
4. a proceeding against the New York city tax appeals tribunal established by section one hundred sixty-eight of the New York city charter shall be commenced in the appellate division of the supreme court, first department.
5. a proceeding challenging apportionment by the legislature shall be commenced in the supreme court in any of the following designated counties in a judicial department where at least one petitioner resides:
(i) first judicial department: New York county;
(ii) second judicial department: Westchester county;
(iii) third judicial department: Albany county; or
(iv) fourth judicial department: Erie county.

Plain-English Summary

Subdivision (a) states the default: unless another rule or the statute authorizing the proceeding says otherwise, a special proceeding may be commenced in any county within the judicial district where it's triable. That's a wider net than the county-specific rules governing ordinary actions, since it lets a petitioner pick any county across an entire judicial district.

Subdivision (b) supplies the venue rule for the core Article 78 setting — a proceeding against a body or officer. The default there lets the petitioner choose among several anchors within the judicial district: where the respondent made the challenged determination, where the respondent refused to perform the duty at issue, where the underlying proceedings that produced the matter being restrained took place, where the material events otherwise occurred, or where the respondent's principal office sits. A list of exceptions then narrows that choice for particular respondents. A proceeding against a Supreme Court justice or a County Court or Court of General Sessions judge belongs in the Appellate Division of the department where the underlying action is triable, or in an adjoining department's Appellate Division if that department's term isn't in session. A proceeding against a list of specific state officials and bodies — the Regents of the University of the State of New York, the Commissioner of Education, the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance, the Tax Appeals Tribunal (except as provided in Tax Law section 2016), the Public Service Commission, the Commissioner or Department of Transportation for certain matters, the Water Resources Board, the Comptroller, and the Department of Agriculture and Markets — belongs in Supreme Court, Albany County. One further exception loosens that: a proceeding against the Commissioner of Education under Education Law section 4404 may instead be brought in the petitioner's county of residence. A proceeding against the New York City Tax Appeals Tribunal belongs in the Appellate Division, First Department. And a proceeding challenging legislative apportionment belongs in Supreme Court, in a designated county within the judicial department where at least one petitioner resides — New York County for the first department, Westchester County for the second, Albany County for the third, and Erie County for the fourth.

This is the venue map anyone bringing an Article 78 challenge against a state agency needs to check before filing. Getting it wrong for one of the enumerated officials or bodies means the proceeding belongs in Albany regardless of where the petitioner lives or where the underlying event took place.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where do I bring an Article 78 proceeding against a state agency in New York?

It depends on the respondent. The general rule lets a petitioner choose among several anchors — where the determination was made, where events occurred, or the respondent's principal office — but a specific list of state officials and bodies must be sued in Supreme Court, Albany County instead.

Which state officials must be sued in Albany County?

CPLR 506(b)(2) lists the Regents of the University of the State of New York, the Commissioner of Education, the Commissioner of Taxation and Finance, the Tax Appeals Tribunal, the Public Service Commission, the Commissioner or Department of Transportation for certain matters, the Water Resources Board, the Comptroller, and the Department of Agriculture and Markets.

Where do I challenge a Supreme Court justice's ruling in a special proceeding?

In the Appellate Division of the judicial department where the underlying action is triable, or in an adjoining department's Appellate Division if that department isn't in session at the time.

Can I sue the Commissioner of Education outside Albany County?

Only for a proceeding brought under Education Law section 4404, which CPLR 506(b)(3) allows to be brought in the petitioner's county of residence instead of Albany County.

Where do I bring a legislative apportionment challenge?

In Supreme Court, in the county designated for the judicial department where at least one petitioner resides — New York County, Westchester County, Albany County, or Erie County, depending on the department.

What's the general venue rule for special proceedings?

Under CPLR 506(a), unless another provision says otherwise, a special proceeding may be commenced in any county within the judicial district where it's triable.

Advisory Committee Notes

Subd (a), applying to special proceedings generally, is new. It is modeled on CPA § 1287. Since special proceedings are brought on in much the same manner as a motion, the special proceeding may be brought in any county within the judicial district where the proceeding is triable.

Subd (b) is derived from CPA § 1287. Minor changes have been made in terminology and the following provision has been omitted as unnecessary: “The special term at which relief is applied for may, in the exercise of its discretion, transfer the proceeding to the county wherein the principal office of the respondent is located.”

Amendment History

Add, L 1962, ch 308, eff Sept 1, 1963; amd, L 1962, ch 318, § 3; L 1970, ch 267, § 8; L 1986, ch 282, § 16; L 1988, ch 41, § 1, eff April 9, 1988; L 1992, ch 47, § 1, eff April 7, 1992; L 1992, ch 808, § 1, eff Oct 1, 1992; L 2024, ch 91, § 1, effective February 28, 2024.

Source & verification. Provision text, History, and Advisory Committee Notes are reproduced verbatim from the Consolidated Laws of New York. Last verified July 21, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: Article 78 venue New Yorkwhere to sue a state agency New Yorkspecial proceeding venue rule NYAlbany County venue state officialsCPLR 506 venue special proceedingapportionment challenge venue NY