§ 4548.Privileged communications; electronic communication thereof.
Article 45. Evidence · Last amended 1999 · Last verified July 21, 2026
Full Text of CPLR 4548
Plain-English Summary
Privilege law developed around face-to-face conversations and sealed letters, and email threatened to complicate it: does a privileged message lose its protection because IT staff, email providers, or telecom carriers could in theory read it in transit? CPLR 4548 answers no. A communication that qualifies for privilege under Article 45 does not forfeit that privileged status for the sole reason that it traveled by electronic means.
The statute names the specific worry directly: the fact that people necessary to deliver or facilitate the electronic communication may have access to its content does not defeat the privilege. A system administrator who could technically read a privileged email while maintaining the server, or a service provider that routes a text message, does not create the kind of third-party disclosure that normally waives privilege.
This matters across every privilege the CPLR recognizes, attorney-client, physician-patient, clergy-penitent, and the rest, since modern practice runs almost entirely on electronic communication. Without this rule, litigants could argue that any privileged email or text was never truly confidential because of how digital infrastructure works. CPLR 4548 forecloses that argument outright.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does emailing my lawyer waive attorney-client privilege in New York?
No. CPLR 4548 provides that a privileged communication does not lose its privileged status just because it was sent by electronic means.
Can an opposing party argue privilege is waived because an IT administrator could access the email server?
No. The statute specifically addresses that concern, providing that access by people necessary to deliver or facilitate the electronic communication does not defeat the privilege.
Which privileges does CPLR 4548 protect?
It applies to any communication privileged under Article 45, including attorney-client and physician-patient privilege, when that communication is sent electronically.
Does this rule apply to text messages, not just email?
Yes, it applies to communication by any electronic means, which includes text messages along with email and similar formats.
Why was CPLR 4548 needed if privilege already existed for in-person communications?
It removes any doubt that electronic transmission, and the technical access that comes with it, changes how courts treat an otherwise privileged communication.
Amendment History
Formerly § 4547, add, L 1998, ch 156, § 1; amd, L 1999, ch 56, § 1, eff May 25, 1999.