§ 350.Legally protected health activities.
Article 3-A. Conflict of Law in Actions Related to Legally Protected Health Activity · Last amended 2025 · Last verified July 21, 2026
Full Text of CPLR 350
Plain-English Summary
CPLR 350 is a single-section article, added at the end of 2025, that answers a choice-of-law question rather than a service or jurisdiction question. When a case heard in a New York court relates to legally protected health activity, a term defined in Criminal Procedure Law 570.17, New York law governs. The section overrides any general or special law, any common-law rule, and any conflict-of-law principle that might otherwise point a court toward applying another state's law.
Ordinarily, a New York court deciding which state's law applies to a dispute weighs factors like where the parties are located, where the conduct occurred, and what law the parties may have chosen for themselves. Section 350 replaces that balancing test, for this category of case, with a fixed rule: New York law applies. A choice-of-law clause pointing to another state, or a common-law doctrine that would otherwise favor another state's law, gives way.
The section reaches only cases and controversies heard in a New York court. It's part of a broader legislative package enacted in December 2025 responding to other states' attempts to use their own law, or their courts' process, to reach conduct connected to reproductive health care and gender-affirming care that's lawful in New York. Section 350 supplies the choice-of-law backbone for that package inside the CPLR itself, while the definition of what activity is protected lives in the Criminal Procedure Law.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does CPLR 350 do?
It directs that New York law, not the law of any other state, governs a case heard in a New York court when that case relates to legally protected health activity.
What is 'legally protected health activity'?
The term is defined in Criminal Procedure Law 570.17, not in the CPLR itself; CPLR 350 borrows that definition to trigger its choice-of-law rule.
Does CPLR 350 apply to cases filed in other states?
No. By its terms, CPLR 350 governs a case or controversy heard in a New York court -- it directs how New York courts decide the choice-of-law question, not how courts in other states decide theirs.
Can a contract clause choosing another state's law override CPLR 350?
No. The section is written to override any general or special law, common-law rule, or conflict-of-law principle that would otherwise point to another state's law, which reaches contractual choice-of-law clauses as well as judge-made conflict-of-laws doctrines.
Why was CPLR 350 enacted?
It's part of a December 2025 shield-law package (Laws of 2025, chapter 694) responding to other states' efforts to use their own law or legal process to reach reproductive health care and gender-affirming care that's lawful in New York.
Is CPLR 350 the only shield-law protection for health care providers in New York?
No. It supplies the CPLR's choice-of-law piece of a broader package; other protections against out-of-state subpoenas, extradition, and licensing actions appear elsewhere in New York law.
Amendment History
L 2025, ch 694, § 21, effective December 19, 2025.