R 3214.Motions heard by judge supervising disclosure; stay of disclosure.
Article 32. Accelerated Judgment · Last amended 1997 · Last verified July 21, 2026
Full Text of CPLR 3214
Plain-English Summary
CPLR 3214 keeps a case's pretrial motions in front of one judge. Whenever it's practical, every motion made before trial goes to the judge already assigned to supervise disclosure in that case, so the parties aren't explaining the same history to a new judge each time.
Serving a notice of motion under CPLR 3211, 3212, or 3213 also triggers an automatic pause: disclosure stops until the court decides the motion, unless it orders otherwise. There is little reason to spend money and time on discovery while a motion that could end the case sits undecided.
One motion doesn't get the automatic stay: a motion based solely on improper service of the summons and complaint. Because that motion turns on a narrow factual question rather than the merits, disclosure keeps moving unless the court specifically orders a stay, so a defendant can't use a service objection to freeze the whole case.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does filing a motion to dismiss stop discovery in New York?
Yes. Serving a notice of motion under CPLR 3211, 3212, or 3213 automatically stays disclosure until the court decides the motion, unless the court orders otherwise.
What is the exception to the automatic stay under CPLR 3214?
When a motion rests only on improper service of the summons and complaint, disclosure continues unless the court specifically orders a stay.
Which judge hears pretrial motions under CPLR 3214?
Whenever practical, motions go to the same judge already assigned to supervise disclosure in the case, so one judge stays familiar with its history.
Can a court lift the automatic stay of disclosure under CPLR 3214?
Yes. The court can order disclosure to continue despite a pending dispositive motion if it decides that is the better course.
Does a CPLR 3213 motion for summary judgment in lieu of complaint also stay discovery?
Advisory Committee Notes
Subd (a) of this rule is new. By providing that successive motions in an action be referred to the same judge, whenever practicable, they allow a single judge to develop a greater understanding of the case and avoid the wasted time required while a new judge acquaints himself with all prior proceedings.
Subd (b) of this rule is designed to prevent free and perhaps unnecessary resort to disclosure after a motion is made, except as the court sees fit.
Amendment History
Add, L 1962, ch 308; amd, L 1962, ch 315, § 1, eff Sept 1, 1963; L 1986, ch 355, § 7, eff July 17, 1986; L 1996, ch 501, § 2, eff Jan 1, 1997.