§ 1329.Vacating or modifying attachment
Article 13-A. Proceeds of Crime—forfeiture · Last amended 1984 · Last verified July 21, 2026
Full Text of CPLR 1329
Plain-English Summary
Where section 1328 releases property in exchange for security, section 1329 challenges the attachment head-on, without requiring the defendant to post anything. Before the property or debt is applied to satisfy a judgment, the defendant, the garnishee, or anyone with an interest in the property can move, on notice to each party and the claiming agent, to vacate or modify the order of attachment. On that motion, the court can give the claiming authority a chance to fix any defect. But once the defendant has appeared and the court determines the attachment is not needed to secure the claiming authority's interest, the court must vacate the order, a mandatory outcome rather than a matter of discretion.
Subdivision 2 puts the burden squarely on the claiming authority: it must establish the grounds for the attachment, the continuing need to maintain the levy, and the probability that it will succeed on the merits, the same standard section 1317(2) points to when an attachment obtained without notice comes up for confirmation. As with the motions under sections 1318, 1319, and 1328, making this motion does not by itself count as an appearance in the action.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can I challenge an attachment without posting security?
Move under section 1329 to vacate or modify the order; unlike a discharge under section 1328, this does not require an undertaking.
Who has to prove the attachment is justified once I've appeared in the case?
The claiming authority, which must establish the grounds for the attachment, the need to continue the levy, and its probability of success on the merits.
If the court finds the attachment isn't needed, can it choose to leave it in place anyway?
No, once the defendant has appeared and the court finds the attachment unnecessary to secure the claiming authority's interest, it must vacate the order.
Can the claiming authority fix a defective attachment application instead of losing it outright?
Yes, the court may give the claiming authority a reasonable opportunity to correct any defect before ruling on the motion.
Does filing this motion count as appearing in the action?
No, the motion does not by itself constitute an appearance.
Amendment History
Add, L 1984, ch 669, § 1, eff Aug 1, 1984 and applicable to crimes committed on and after Aug 1, 1984.