§ 1319.Service of summons
Article 13-A. Proceeds of Crime—forfeiture · Last amended 1992 · Last verified July 21, 2026
Full Text of CPLR 1319
Plain-English Summary
An order of attachment can issue before the defendant is ever served, but section 1319 keeps that head start from lasting indefinitely. If the order was granted before service, it stays valid only if, within sixty days, a summons is served on the defendant or the first publication of the summons is made under a court order and later completed. A person who acted on the order as valid, without knowing it had lapsed, is not liable for that reliance.
The section also addresses what happens if the defendant dies during that window: the order remains valid only if the summons is served on the defendant's executor or administrator within sixty days after letters are issued. A court can extend the original sixty-day period, by up to sixty more days, for good cause, but the application for that extension must be made before the original deadline expires.
This deadline ties attachment to the underlying lawsuit's progress, so property cannot stay frozen under an order tied to a case the defendant has never been told about. It works alongside sections 1317 and 1318, which govern how the order itself is obtained and filed, and section 1330, which describes when an attachment ends for good.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long after an attachment order is granted must I be served with the summons?
Sixty days, or the order loses its validity, subject to a possible extension.
What happens if I die before I'm served with the summons in a forfeiture case?
The order remains valid only if the summons is served on your executor or administrator within sixty days after letters are issued.
Can the court give the claiming authority more time to serve me?
Yes, up to sixty additional days for good cause, but the extension application must be made before the original sixty-day deadline runs out.
If the attachment order becomes invalid because I wasn't served in time, is someone who relied on it liable?
No, a person who acted on the order as valid, without knowledge of the invalidity, is not liable for that reliance.
Does publishing the summons satisfy this sixty-day deadline?
Yes, first publication under a court order, followed by completed publication, satisfies the requirement in place of personal service.
Amendment History
Add, L 1984, ch 669, § 1; amd, L 1992, ch 216, § 11, eff July 1, 1992.