Rule 1-011.Signing of pleadings, motions, and other papers; sanctions; unsworn affirmations under penalty of perjury
Last amended November 18, 2015 · Last verified June 26, 2026
Full Text of Rule 1-011
Rule History
[As amended, effective January 1, 1995; March 1, 2005; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 07-8300-040, effective February 25, 2008; by Supreme Court Order No. 08-8300-022, effective September 12, 2008; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 14-8300-023, effective for all pleadings and papers filed on or after December 31, 2014; as amended by Supreme Court Order No. 15-8300-024, effective for all pleadings and papers filed after November 18, 2015.]
Committee Commentary
New Mexico has enacted an Electronic Authentication Documentation Act which provides for the Secretary of State to register electronic signatures using the public key technology. See Section 14-15-4 NMSA 1978.
Committee commentary for 2008 and 2014 amendments. — Rule 1-011 NMRA was amended in 2008 to permit self-affirmation in lieu of notarization of any written sworn statement required or permitted under the Rules of Civil Procedure for the District Courts. The 2008 amendment, however, did not permit self-affirmation of a statement that must be sworn under statute. See, e.g., NMSA 1978, § 40-4-6 (providing that a petition for dissolution of marriage “must be verified by the affidavit of the petitioner”). The 2014 amendment removed that limitation. See Miller & Assocs., Inc. v. Rainwater, 1985-NMSC-001, ¶¶ 6-8, 102 N.M. 170, 692 P.2d 1390 (holding that NMSA 1978, Section 38-7-1, which requires the denial of an account to be “under oath, in writing, and filed as a part of the pleadings before trial,” is “merely a rule of procedure” and therefore is unconstitutional under Ammerman v. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc., 1976-NMSC-031, 89 N.M. 307, 551 P.2d 1354). Thus, notarization is no longer required for any written statement in a court proceeding, including a declaration, verification, certificate, oath, affirmation, acknowledgment, or affidavit, as long as the statement is affirmed under penalty of perjury in accordance with Paragraph B of this rule. Accord NMSA 1978, § 30-25-1(A) (2009) (“Perjury consists of making a false statement under oath, affirmation or penalty of perjury, material to the issue or matter involved in the course of any judicial, administrative, legislative or other official proceeding or matter, knowing such statement to be untrue.” (emphasis added)).
Although Paragraph B permits self-affirmation of documents in lieu of notarization, the rule is not intended to alter any statutory requirements that may exist for notarizing documents to be filed with other governmental agencies. Moreover, nothing in the 2008 or 2014 amendments prohibit a person from using a notary, and many of the Civil Forms for use in the district courts still include the option for notarization. The amendments simply provide an alternative method for providing written sworn statements that may be permitted or required under rule or statute.
[As amended by Supreme Court Order No. 14-8300-023, effective December 31, 2014.]
Plain-English Summary
This rule puts a name and a promise behind every court filing. A represented party’s pleadings, motions, and papers must be signed by at least one attorney of record, in that attorney’s own name, with an address and phone number; a self-represented party signs and gives the same information. The signature certifies that the signer read the paper, believes there is good ground to support it, and is not filing it for delay. A paper signed to defeat the rule may be stricken as sham, an unsigned paper is stricken unless promptly signed once the omission is noticed, and a willful violation—or inserting scandalous matter—can draw discipline.
The second half lets an unsworn affirmation stand in for notarization. Except as Rule 1-120 provides, a written statement that is not notarized has the same effect as a notarized one if it shows the date, the signer’s signature, and an affirmation under penalty of perjury under New Mexico law that the statement is true. As the committee commentary explains, after the 2008 and 2014 amendments notarization is no longer required for any written statement in a court proceeding, though using a notary remains an option.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does signing a pleading certify?
That the signer read the paper, believes in good faith there is good ground to support it, and is not filing it for delay.
Do court documents have to be notarized in New Mexico?
No. An unsworn written statement has the same effect as a notarized one if it includes the date, the signer’s signature, and an affirmation under penalty of perjury that the statement is true and correct.
What happens to an unsigned filing?
It is stricken unless it is signed promptly after the omission is pointed out to the party or attorney.