§ 6-327.Depositions to perpetuate testimony.
Article 3: Nebraska Court Rules of Discovery in Civil Cases. (Effective January 1, 2025.) · Last amended January 1, 2025 · Last verified July 22, 2026
This section prints two full, separately-dated versions in the official compilation (the January 1, 2025 discovery/pleading rewrite); both are shown below, current version first.
Full Text of § 6-327
Amendment History
Current version (effective January 1, 2025)
Rule 27(b) amended January 14, 1998. Renumbered and codified as § 6-327, effective July 18, 2008. § 6-327(a) (2) amended October 21, 2015, effective January 1, 2016; § 6-327 amended November 13, 2024, effective January 1, 2025.
Prior version (in effect before January 1, 2025)
Rule 27(b) amended January 14, 1998. Renumbered and codified as § 6-327, effective July 18, 2008. § 6-327(a) (2) amended October 21, 2015, effective January 1, 2016.
Official Comment
Current version (effective January 1, 2025)
COMMENTS TO § 6-327 [1] The primary purpose of the rule is to perpetuate evidence – in other words, to preserve evidence (usually, witness testimony) – that might otherwise be lost before the action is filed. The original version of the rule required the person seeking to perpetuate evidence to file a petition in the district court for the district in which any expected adverse party resides. The 2024 Amendments changed that to the district court for the county where any expected adverse party resides. As a result of the change, the venue provisions of the rule are now consistent with the residency provisions of the general venue statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-401.01(1). [2] Subpart (a)(2) authorizes substitute service on an expected adverse party who cannot be served by the normal methods of service. Subpart (a)(3) requires the court to appoint an attorney to represent an expected adverse party who is served by substitute service. Subpart (a)(3) also requires the court to appoint a guardian ad litem for any expected adverse party who is a minor or an incompetent person. If a minor or an incompetent person is served by substitute service, then the court must appoint both an attorney and a guardian ad litem. The reason is that roles of the attorney and guardian are different. The role of an attorney is to represent the party’s legal interests. The role of a guardian ad litem is to act in the best interests of the party and to make decisions for the party, including the decisions that a client normally makes. [3] The rule does not discuss who pays the attorney or the guardian. That is a matter left to the district court’s discretion. [4] Subpart (a)(5) discusses when a deposition that was taken to perpetuate evidence may be used in the action once it is filed. If the deposition was taken pursuant to Federal Rule 27 or the law of another state, then the deposition may be used if it would be admissible in the federal or state court that authorized it to be taken. The reason for including federal courts is that a petition to perpetuate could be filed in federal court and the action filed in state court. [5] Subpart (b) governs motions to perpetuate testimony that are filed while an appeal is pending. The motion must be filed in the appellate court because the trial court loses jurisdiction once the appeal is filed. See Billups v. Scott, 253 Neb. 293, 294 (1997). Because the trial court may be more familiar with the case than the appellate court is, the rule gives the appellate court the discretion to remand the motion to the trial court. The appellate court, however, retains jurisdiction of the appeal. [6] Subpart (b) only applies if an appeal has been taken. It does not authorize a party to file a motion to perpetuate after judgment is entered but before the time for appeal expires. The party’s only option in that situation is to file an independent action to perpetuate testimony. Subpart (c) specifically provides that the rule does not limit a court’s power to entertain an action to perpetuate testimony.
Prior version (in effect before January 1, 2025)
COMMENT TO RULE 27 The language of Rule 27 is substantially similar to federal rule 27 and to former Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 25-1267.08 to 25-1267.13 (Repealed 1982).
Plain-English Summary
Some testimony cannot wait for a lawsuit to catch up to it. Section 6-327 gives a person who expects to become a party to a future Nebraska case, but cannot yet bring it, a way to preserve testimony before filing. The petitioner files a verified petition in the district court where an expected adverse party resides, describing the anticipated case, the facts to be established, the expected opposing parties, and the name and expected testimony of each witness to be deposed. The petitioner must serve every expected adverse party at least 21 days before the hearing; if that service cannot be made with reasonable diligence, the court can order substitute service, and it must appoint an attorney to represent — and cross-examine on behalf of — an adverse party served that way, plus a guardian ad litem for anyone who is a minor or incompetent. If the court finds that perpetuating the testimony may prevent a failure or delay of justice, it authorizes the deposition, which can later be used in any later-filed Nebraska case involving the same subject matter.
The rule also covers a second scenario: preserving testimony while a judgment is on appeal, for use if the case gets remanded. A party asks the appellate court for leave to depose witnesses, showing who they are, what they are expected to say, and why the testimony needs preserving now. The appellate court can rule on the motion itself or send it down to the trial court, while keeping jurisdiction of the appeal. Neither path in this rule limits a court’s separate power to hear an independent action to perpetuate testimony.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I depose a witness before I have even filed my lawsuit?
Yes, if you expect to be a party to a Nebraska action you cannot yet bring, you may file a verified petition asking the district court for leave to depose named witnesses to preserve their testimony.
Where do I file a petition to perpetuate testimony before filing suit?
In the district court for the county where any expected adverse party resides.
How much notice must an expected adverse party receive before the hearing on the petition?
At least 21 days before the hearing date, served in the manner used for a summons unless the court orders substitute service.
What happens if an expected adverse party cannot be served with reasonable diligence?
The court may order substitute service and must appoint an attorney to represent that party and cross-examine the deponent, plus a guardian ad litem if the party is a minor or incompetent.
Can this rule be used to preserve testimony while a case is on appeal?
Yes. A party may move the appellate court for leave to depose witnesses to preserve testimony in case the action is remanded for further proceedings.
Does this rule replace a court’s power to entertain a separate action to perpetuate testimony?
No. The rule expressly does not limit a court’s power to hear an independent action for that purpose.