§ 25-824.02.Frivolous actions; actual attorney's fee; effect of award; stipulations authorized.
Article 8: Pleadings · Last amended 1987 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-824.02
Source
Laws 1987, LB 261, § 3.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-824.02 clears up a question that could otherwise cloud sections 25-824 through 25-824.03: does a court-ordered fee award replace what a client pays an attorney? The answer is no. Nothing in these sections stops an attorney and client from negotiating the fee the client pays, regardless of what a court might separately award or decline to award under section 25-824.
The section also confirms that courts can approve agreements between the parties that change the default outcome. A written stipulation filed with the court, or an oral stipulation made in open court, agreeing to no award of attorney’s fees or costs — or to an award structured differently than sections 25-824 to 25-824.03 would otherwise provide — is within the court’s authority to approve.
In practice, this gives litigants a way to resolve fee disputes by agreement instead of litigating every factor under section 25-824.01, while leaving the private business relationship between an attorney and client untouched by any fee award a court enters against an opposing party.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a court-ordered fee award under section 25-824 limit what I can pay my own attorney?
No. Section 25-824.02 states that nothing in the frivolous-action sections prevents an attorney and client from negotiating the actual fee the client pays.
Can parties agree to waive attorney’s fees that would otherwise be owed under the frivolous-action statutes?
Yes. A court may approve a written stipulation filed with the court, or an oral stipulation in open court, agreeing to no award of attorney’s fees or costs.
Does a stipulation about fees have to be in writing?
No. It can be a written stipulation filed with the court or an oral stipulation made in open court.
Can parties agree to a different fee amount than a court might otherwise award?
Why does this section exist alongside section 25-824?
It clarifies that the mandatory fee-shifting scheme in section 25-824 does not restrict private fee agreements or settlements between the parties over fees.