RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 25-414.Choice of forum; jurisdiction; conditions.

Article 4: Venue · Last amended 1969 · Last verified July 22, 2026

In one sentenceSection 25-414 lets a Nebraska court hear a case under a written agreement naming Nebraska as the forum, so long as the court can hear it, Nebraska is reasonably convenient, the agreement was not obtained unfairly, and the defendant was properly served, while excluding cognovit clauses, arbitration clauses, and statutory agents for service.

Full Text of § 25-414

Text size

(1) If the parties have agreed in writing that an action on a controversy may be brought in this state and the agreement provides the only basis for the exercise of jurisdiction, a court of this state will entertain the action if (a) the court has power under the law of this state to entertain the action; (b) this state is a reasonably convenient place for the trial of the action; (c) the agreement as to the place of the action was not obtained by misrepresentation, duress, the abuse of economic power, or other unconscionable means; and (d) the defendant, if within the state, was served as required by law of this state in the case of persons within the state or, if without the state, was served either personally or by certified mail directed to his last-known address.
(2) This section does not apply to cognovit clauses, to arbitration clauses, or to the appointment of an agent for the service of process pursuant to statute or court order.

Source

Laws 1969, c. 179, § 2, p. 769.

Plain-English Summary

Businesses and individuals sometimes agree in advance, in writing, that if a dispute arises between them, it will be litigated in a particular place. Section 25-414 addresses what happens when that place is Nebraska and the written agreement is the only basis offered for a Nebraska court’s jurisdiction over the case.

In that situation, a Nebraska court will hear the case if four conditions are met. The court must have power under Nebraska law to hear this type of action in the first place; Nebraska must be a reasonably convenient place to try it; the agreement naming Nebraska as the forum must not have been obtained through misrepresentation, duress, abuse of economic power, or other unconscionable means; and the defendant must have been properly served — personally or by law if within the state, or personally or by certified mail to the last-known address if outside the state.

The section carves out three situations it does not govern. It does not apply to cognovit clauses, which are provisions letting a creditor obtain judgment against a debtor without normal notice or a hearing. It does not apply to arbitration clauses, which route disputes to arbitration instead of court. And it does not apply to the appointment of an agent for service of process required by statute or court order, since that is a different jurisdictional mechanism entirely.

Frequently Asked Questions

If a contract says disputes will be litigated in Nebraska, will a Nebraska court automatically hear the case?

Not automatically. Section 25-414 requires that the court have power to hear the action, that Nebraska be a reasonably convenient forum, that the agreement not have been obtained by misrepresentation, duress, or unconscionable means, and that the defendant be properly served.

What counts as proper service of a defendant outside Nebraska under this section?

Service made either personally or by certified mail directed to the defendant’s last-known address.

Does this section apply to arbitration clauses?

No. Section 25-414 expressly excludes arbitration clauses from its scope.

What is a cognovit clause, and does this section cover it?

A cognovit clause is a contract provision allowing a creditor to obtain judgment against a debtor without the usual notice or hearing; section 25-414 explicitly does not apply to that type of clause.

Can a party challenge a Nebraska forum-selection agreement by claiming it was signed under pressure?

Section 25-414 conditions the court’s willingness to hear the case on the agreement not having been obtained by duress, misrepresentation, abuse of economic power, or other unconscionable means, so those circumstances are relevant to whether the agreement holds up.

Does this section apply if the forum-selection agreement is only one of several bases for the court’s jurisdiction?

No. Section 25-414 applies where the written agreement provides the only basis for the exercise of jurisdiction.

Source & verification. Section text and the amendment-history citation are reproduced verbatim from the Nebraska Legislature, Revisor of Statutes, enacted by the Nebraska Legislature. Last verified July 22, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: forum selection clause nebraskachoice of forum agreement nebraska courtcontract says sue in nebraskacognovit clause exclusion venuearbitration clause choice of forumenforcing forum selection agreement nebraska