Article 35: Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act · Last amended 2019 · Last verified July 22, 2026
In one sentenceThis section aligns the Act with federal Communications Decency Act protections for interactive computer services, providing that a platform is not treated as the discloser of content someone else created unless it helped create or develop that content, and preserving good-faith moderation immunity and state sovereign immunity.
Full Text of § 25-3507
Text size
(a) In an action brought under the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act, no provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as a person disclosing any information provided by another information content provider unless the provider or user of such interactive computer service is responsible, in whole or in part, for the creation or development of the information provided through the Internet or any other interactive service.
(b) No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be held liable under the act on account of:
(1) any action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict access to or availability of material that the provider or user considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected; or
(2) any action taken to enable or make available to any information content provider or others the technical means to restrict access to material described in subdivision (b)(1) of this section.
(c) Nothing in the Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act shall be construed to impose liability on an interactive
computer service for content provided by another person.
(d) The Uniform Civil Remedies for Unauthorized Disclosure of Intimate Images Act must be construed to be consistent with 47 U.S.C. 230, as such section existed on January 1, 2019.
(e) The act may not be construed to alter the law of this state on sovereign immunity.
(f) For purposes of this section, information content provider and interactive computer service have the same meanings as in 47 U.S.C. 230, as such section existed on January 1, 2019.
Source
Laws 2019, LB680, § 7.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-3507 addresses how the Act interacts with online platforms and services. A provider or user of an interactive computer service is not treated as a person who disclosed information provided by another content provider, unless the platform is responsible, in whole or in part, for creating or developing the information at issue. That mirrors the framework of 47 U.S.C. 230, and the section directs that the Act be construed consistent with that federal provision as it existed on January 1, 2019.
The section also protects a platform’s good-faith content moderation decisions: a provider or user is not liable under the Act for voluntarily restricting access to material it considers obscene, lewd, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not that material is constitutionally protected, or for providing others the technical means to do the same. Nothing in the Act imposes liability on an interactive computer service for content another person provided, and nothing in the Act alters Nebraska’s law on sovereign immunity. The terms “information content provider” and “interactive computer service” carry the same meanings here that they carry under the federal statute.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does this Act make websites liable for intimate images their users post?
Generally no. A platform is not treated as having disclosed content provided by another person unless it helped create or develop that content, consistent with the federal framework in 47 U.S.C. 230.
What if a platform removes or restricts access to objectionable content in good faith?
The section shields a provider or user from liability for voluntarily restricting access to material it considers obscene, lewd, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, and for giving others the technical means to do so.
Does this section change Nebraska’s sovereign immunity?
No. It states that nothing in the Act may be construed to alter the law of Nebraska on sovereign immunity.
Where do the terms “interactive computer service” and “information content provider” come from?
They carry the same meanings given to them under 47 U.S.C. 230, as that section existed on January 1, 2019.
Can a platform be liable if it helped create the content at issue?
Yes. The protection applies only where the platform is not responsible, in whole or in part, for creating or developing the information provided through the internet or another interactive service.
Source & verification. Section text and the amendment-history citation are
reproduced verbatim from the Nebraska Legislature, Revisor of Statutes, enacted by the
Nebraska Legislature. Last verified July 22, 2026. ·
Official source
Also known as:section 230 immunity intimate image act Nebraskaplatform liability unauthorized disclosure actgood faith content moderation immunityinteractive computer service definition act