RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 25-320.Permissive joinder of defendants.

Article 3: Parties · Last amended 1998 · Last verified July 22, 2026

In one sentenceThis section allows multiple defendants to be joined together in a single lawsuit when a right to relief against them, whether joint, several, or alternative, arises from the same transaction or series of transactions and shares a common question of law or fact.

Full Text of § 25-320

Text size

All persons may be joined in one action as defendants if there is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative any right to relief in respect of or arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences and if any question of law or fact common to all defendants will arise in the action.

Source

R.S.1867, Code § 44, p. 399; R.S.1913, § 7601; C.S.1922, § 8544; C.S.1929, § 20-320; R.S.1943, § 25-320; Laws 1998, LB 234, § 2.

Plain-English Summary

Section 25-320 sets the test for putting more than one defendant into a single Nebraska lawsuit. Two conditions have to be met together. First, the plaintiff’s right to relief against the defendants must arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences — whether the plaintiff is asserting that right jointly against them, severally against each, or in the alternative between them. Second, at least one question of law or fact common to all the defendants must arise in the case. Both parts matter: a shared event alone is not enough without a common question, and a common legal issue alone is not enough without a connection to the same underlying transaction.

This is a permissive rule, not a mandatory one. It tells a plaintiff who could join several defendants that doing so is allowed, not that it is required. That distinguishes it from section 25-318, which addresses parties who are so united in interest that they must be joined, and from section 25-323, which gives the court its own power to order necessary parties brought into a pending case regardless of what the plaintiff prefers.

A car accident with two drivers whose combined negligence caused a single collision is a familiar fit: the plaintiff’s claims against both drivers arise from the same occurrence, and the case will turn on common questions about how the accident happened. Section 25-320 lets the plaintiff sue both in one action instead of filing two separate lawsuits over the same event.

Frequently Asked Questions

What two things does a plaintiff need to join multiple defendants under section 25-320?

A right to relief against them arising from the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, and at least one question of law or fact common to all the defendants.

Does the right to relief have to be identical against every defendant?

No. The statute covers relief asserted jointly, severally, or in the alternative, so the plaintiff’s theories against each defendant can differ as long as they arise from the same transaction or occurrence.

Is a plaintiff required to join all potential defendants from the same event in one lawsuit?

No. Section 25-320 is permissive — it allows joinder when its conditions are met, but it does not force a plaintiff to sue every possible defendant in a single action.

How does permissive joinder of defendants differ from the necessary joinder in section 25-318?

Section 25-318 covers parties who are united in interest and must be joined together, while section 25-320 gives a plaintiff the option to join defendants connected by a shared transaction and a common question, without requiring it.

Can defendants be joined if their only connection is an unrelated legal question?

No. A common question of law or fact is not enough by itself; the claims against the defendants must also arise from the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences.

What happens if a plaintiff joins defendants who do not share a common question or transaction?

The statute’s own text limits joinder to defendants meeting both conditions, so a defendant who does not fit either requirement would not be a proper party under this section.

Source & verification. Section text and the amendment-history citation are reproduced verbatim from the Nebraska Legislature, Revisor of Statutes, enacted by the Nebraska Legislature. Last verified July 22, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: suing multiple defendants nebraskapermissive joinder of defendantssame transaction or occurrence rulecommon question of law or factjoining defendants in one lawsuit