§ 25-2747.Evidence; stipulation; document; objections; Nebraska Evidence Rules; applicability; health care provider report; form.
Article 27: County Court Rules of Procedure and Probate Practice · Last amended 2020 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-2747
Source
Laws 2020, LB912, § 7.
Cross References
Nebraska Evidence Rules, see section 27-1103.
Plain-English Summary
Parties in an expedited action should stipulate to factual and evidentiary matters as much as possible, which keeps trials within the Act’s tight time limits. Where they do not stipulate, the Act creates a shortcut for admitting documents. A court may overrule authenticity and hearsay objections to a document, even without a custodian or other qualified witness testifying, if the offering party gave notice at least ninety days before trial along with a copy of the document, the document appears on its face to be what it is claimed to be, it appears on its face to be non-hearsay or to fall within a recognized hearsay exception, and the objecting party has not raised a substantial question about its authenticity or trustworthiness. Objections to a noticed document must be raised within thirty days after receiving the notice, and the shortcut does not reach a document that combines hearsay within hearsay unless each layer independently satisfies a hearsay exception on the document’s face. Outside these specific provisions, the Nebraska Evidence Rules still govern.
The Act gives similar treatment to treating health care provider reports. On a form the Supreme Court adopts, signed by the provider, such a report can substitute for that provider’s deposition or in-court testimony about the plaintiff. Unless the parties stipulate or the court orders otherwise, the report has to be served on all parties at least ninety days before trial, and any objection — including that the report is incomplete or otherwise noncompliant — must be raised within thirty days of receiving it. For good cause, the court can order the report supplemented. A party against whom the report may be used still has the right, at that party’s own initial expense, to cross-examine the provider by deposition, and that deposition can be used at trial.
Neither the health care provider’s deposition nor the discovery of an expert’s facts or opinions under this section counts against the numerical discovery limits set in section 25-2744.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to agree to facts and documents I would normally contest at trial?
The Act directs parties to stipulate to factual and evidentiary matters to the greatest extent possible, though it does not force agreement — it also provides a fallback procedure for admitting documents without a stipulation.
How can a document get into evidence without a witness to authenticate it?
If the offering party gives at least ninety days’ notice with a copy of the document, the document appears genuine and non-hearsay (or within a hearsay exception) on its face, and the objecting party has not raised a substantial question about its authenticity or trustworthiness.
How much advance notice must I give before trial to use this document shortcut?
At least ninety days before trial, along with a copy of the document.
Can my treating doctor’s written report replace an in-court appearance?
Yes, if it is on the Supreme Court-adopted form, signed by the provider, and served on the parties at least ninety days before trial, absent a different stipulation or court order.
If I disagree with a health care provider’s report, what can I do?
Raise an objection within thirty days of receiving it, and you retain the right, at your own initial expense, to cross-examine the provider by deposition, which can then be used at trial.
Does deposing a health care provider count against my deposition or expert limit?
No. Section 25-2747 states that the health care provider’s deposition, and the discovery of an expert’s facts or opinions under this section, do not count toward the numerical limits in section 25-2744.