§ 25-2157.Writ; when not issued.
Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Not amended since original codification · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-2157
Source
R.S.1867, Code § 646, p. 507; R.S.1913, § 8272; C.S.1922, § 9225; C.S.1929, § 20-2157; R.S.1943, § 25-2157.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-2157 limits when mandamus is even available. The writ may not be issued in any case where there is a plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. Mandamus exists to fill a gap, not to duplicate a remedy already available through an ordinary lawsuit or other process.
The section also addresses who can seek the writ. It may issue on the information of the party beneficially interested — meaning the person with a real stake in the act being compelled, not necessarily the government or an official body, can bring the request.
Frequently Asked Questions
When is a writ of mandamus unavailable in Nebraska?
Whenever a plain and adequate remedy exists in the ordinary course of the law.
Who can seek a writ of mandamus?
The party beneficially interested in having the act performed can bring it on that party’s own information.
What counts as a plain and adequate remedy that would block mandamus?
The section does not list examples; it requires only that the remedy be plain and adequate, leaving the determination to the court on the facts of the case.
Does this section require a petitioner to try every other remedy first?
It bars mandamus only where a plain and adequate remedy already exists — the focus is on whether one exists, not on exhausting every conceivable option.
Why limit mandamus to cases without an adequate legal remedy?
It keeps mandamus a targeted tool for compelling a duty when nothing else will work, rather than a substitute for an ordinary lawsuit.
Is mandamus the same thing as an appeal?
No. This section addresses when mandamus is unavailable because another adequate remedy exists; it is not a stand-in for direct appellate review.