§ 25-2125.Ejectment; answer; contents.
Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 2002 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-2125
Source
R.S.1867, Code § 627, p. 505; R.S.1913, § 8240; C.S.1922, § 9193; C.S.1929, § 20-2125; R.S.1943, § 25-2125; Laws 2002, LB 876, § 31.
Plain-English Summary
Just as section 25-2124 keeps the ejectment complaint short, section 25-2125 keeps the answer short. A defendant can respond with a general denial of the title the complaint alleges, or a general denial that the defendant is withholding possession, whichever fits the defense being raised.
Denying the plaintiff’s title carries a built-in consequence: it is taken as an admission that the defendant possesses the property. The logic runs both ways — if a defendant were not in possession, there would be little point disputing who holds title, so the statute treats a title dispute as conceding the possession question.
The section also addresses partial defenses. When a defendant does not defend the whole property described in the complaint, the answer must describe the particular part being defended, so the case can proceed with a clear picture of what remains contested.
Frequently Asked Questions
How can a defendant respond to an ejectment complaint?
With a general denial of the plaintiff’s claimed title, or a general denial that the defendant is withholding possession, depending on the defense.
What happens if I deny the plaintiff’s title to the land?
Denying the plaintiff’s title is taken as an admission that the defendant possesses the property.
Do I admit anything just by denying title?
Yes. Possession by the defendant is deemed admitted once the defendant denies the plaintiff’s title.
What if I only want to contest part of the property described in the complaint?
The answer must describe the particular part for which the defense is made.
Is a general denial enough to respond to an ejectment complaint?
Yes, the section treats a general denial of title or of withholding possession as sufficient.