§ 25-21,304.Child sexual abuse material; obscene material; prohibited acts; civil action by victim; damages; contributory negligence; civil penalties; Attorney General; enforcement; deceptive trade practice; Internet utilities; supplemental to other remedies; sovereign immunity waived.
Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 2026 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-21,304
Source
Laws 2026, LB935, § 6. Operative Date: July 18, 2026
Cross References
Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, see section 87-306.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-21,304, operative since July 18, 2026, targets prohibited content on the internet — content that is child sexual abuse material as defined in section 28-1802, that promotes such material, or that is obscene as defined in section 28-807. A person may not knowingly and intentionally allow or facilitate access to such content on a publicly available website, issue, sell, give, provide, deliver, transfer, transmit, circulate, or disseminate it by any means on a website, or create or develop it for a website.
An individual depicted in or exposed to prohibited content may sue anyone who violates that prohibition with respect to the content involving them, recovering preliminary or other equitable relief along with actual economic and noneconomic damages, plus reasonable attorney’s fees and litigation costs if the plaintiff prevails. The one carve-out: an adult cannot sue based on exposure to child sexual abuse material that resulted from that adult’s own intentional viewing of it. Within this civil action, contributory negligence does not apply, no plaintiff can be assigned fault, and a violator is jointly and severally liable for the resulting damages.
The Attorney General or a county attorney can separately pursue a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation, seek an injunction and other equitable relief, and recover reasonable fees and costs if successful. Any violation also counts, independently, as a deceptive trade practice under the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act. An internet utility is not liable solely for providing access or a connection to content outside its control, so long as it bears no responsibility for creating or developing the prohibited content. The section states plainly that it creates a new cause of action supplemental to any other remedy, that sovereign immunity is not a defense to it, and that a remedy under it does not depend on a criminal conviction for the same conduct.
Frequently Asked Questions
What content does this section target?
“Prohibited content” — material that is child sexual abuse material as defined in section 28-1802, material that promotes child sexual abuse material, or material that is obscene as defined in section 28-807.
Who can sue under this section?
An individual depicted in or exposed to the prohibited content, against anyone who knowingly and intentionally allowed or facilitated access to it, distributed it, or created or developed it on an internet website.
Is there an exception that limits who can sue?
Yes. An adult cannot sue based on their own intentional viewing of child sexual abuse material — the section does not authorize a claim arising from that adult’s deliberate exposure to the material.
What can a successful plaintiff recover?
Preliminary and other equitable relief as appropriate, actual damages covering both economic and noneconomic loss, and reasonable attorney’s fees and litigation costs.
Does contributory negligence reduce or bar a plaintiff’s recovery in this type of case?
No. The section states that contributory negligence does not apply and no plaintiff may be allocated fault; a violator is jointly and severally liable for the damages caused.
Can the Attorney General or a county attorney also pursue a case under this section?
Yes. Either may seek a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation, an injunction or other equitable relief, and reasonable fees and costs if they prevail.
Does an internet service provider automatically face liability for content it merely transmits or hosts?
No. An internet utility does not violate this section solely by providing access or a connection to content on a website or network outside its control, as long as it is not responsible for creating or developing the prohibited content.
Does sovereign immunity protect a government defendant from this civil action?
No. The section expressly states that sovereign immunity is not an affirmative defense to an action brought under it.