§ 25-21,274.Motor vehicle collision with domestic animal; principles applied.
Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 2001 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-21,274
Source
Laws 2001, LB 781, § 1.
Plain-English Summary
Nebraska is agricultural country, and livestock sometimes wander onto public roads. Section 25-21,274 sets the ground rules for the lawsuit that can follow when a car collides with a cow, horse, or other domestic animal. Whether the vehicle’s owner, operator, or occupant sues the animal’s owner, or the livestock owner sues over an injured animal, three principles govern the case.
First, the burden of proof stays put. It rests on the plaintiff from the start of the case to the end; it never shifts to the defendant partway through. Second, the fact that livestock escaped its enclosure and ended up on the highway is not, by itself, enough to suggest the owner was careless. A fence can fail, a gate can blow open, or an animal can find a way out without anyone doing anything wrong. Third, the standard of care is ordinary negligence, the same reasonable-person standard used across Nebraska tort law, not a strict or absolute liability standard that would hold an owner responsible regardless of fault.
Together, these three principles mean a driver injured after hitting a cow on the road cannot win by pointing to the collision alone. The driver still has to prove the animal’s owner failed to use reasonable care, the same as in any other negligence case.
Frequently Asked Questions
If my car hits a cow on a Nebraska highway, do I automatically win a lawsuit against the owner?
No. Section 25-21,274 requires proof of ordinary negligence; the mere fact that the animal escaped and was struck does not establish the owner’s fault.
Does the burden shift to the animal owner just because livestock got loose?
No. The plaintiff’s burden of proving the case never shifts to the defendant at any point in the litigation.
Is a livestock owner strictly liable whenever an animal gets onto a public road?
No. The section rejects strict or absolute liability, applying ordinary negligence principles instead.
Can the livestock owner also sue the driver if the animal is hurt or killed?
Yes. The section covers actions by the vehicle’s owner, operator, or occupant and by the livestock owner, applying the same negligence principles to either side.
What counts as a domestic animal or a highway for purposes of this section?
Highway and motor vehicle carry the same meaning given in section 39-101, Nebraska’s rules-of-the-road statute; the section applies to collisions with domestic animals on a public highway.