§ 25-21,220.Forcible entry and detainer; against whom proceedings may be had; provisions not exclusive.
Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 2016 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-21,220
Source
Laws 1929, c. 82, § 118, p. 309; C.S.1929, § 22-1202; R.S.1943, § 26-1,119; Laws 1972, LB 1032, § 69; R.S.1943, (1985), § 24-569; Laws 2000, LB 921, § 23; Laws 2016, LB221, § 1.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-21,220 opens Nebraska’s forcible entry and detainer statutes by marking out who can be sued under them. The first and most common category covers a tenant holding over past the lease term, and the statute treats a tenant as holding over the moment rent, or any part of it, goes unpaid when due. A second category covers a tenant who threatens the health or safety of another tenant, the landlord, or the landlord’s employees or agents — and here the tenant gets no chance to fix the problem before the landlord can proceed.
The remaining categories reach past ordinary landlord-tenant disputes. A buyer at a judicial sale, execution, or other court-ordered sale can use these proceedings against a judgment debtor who stayed in possession after the judgment or decree that led to the sale. The same goes for sales by executors, administrators, or guardians, and for partition sales, where a party stayed in possession after the suit began and the court has since found the sale valid. Finally, anyone who settled or occupies land without color of title, up against a person who holds the right to possess it, falls within these proceedings too.
The section closes with a reminder that this list does not confine the eviction statutes that follow. Sections 25-21,219 through 25-21,235 reach beyond these five categories, so a case that does not fit neatly into one of them may still belong in a forcible entry and detainer action under the fuller statutory scheme.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does falling behind on rent make a tenant a holdover tenant under Nebraska law?
Yes. Section 25-21,220 treats a tenant as holding over the moment rent, or any part of it, becomes due and goes unpaid, which puts that tenant within the reach of a forcible entry and detainer action.
Can a landlord skip giving a tenant a chance to fix a safety threat before evicting?
Yes, for this specific ground. When a tenant threatens the health or safety of another tenant, the landlord, or the landlord’s employees or agents, the statute does not give that tenant a right to cure before the landlord proceeds.
Can these eviction proceedings be used after a foreclosure or execution sale?
Yes. A buyer at a judicial sale or execution can use them against a judgment debtor who remained in possession at the time the judgment or decree behind the sale was entered.
Does this section cover sales handled by an executor, administrator, or guardian?
Yes, along with partition sales, so long as a party to the sale or partition was in possession when the suit began and the court has since examined and approved the sale.
What about someone occupying land with no legal claim to it?
Section 25-21,220 reaches a settler or occupier without color of title when the person bringing the action holds the right to possess the property.