§ 25-21,189.Food; donations; limitations on liability.
Article 21: Special Proceedings and Actions · Last amended 1989 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-21,189
Source
Laws 1981, LB 38, § 1; R.S.1943, (1981), § 81-217.29; Laws 1987, LB 201, § 1; Laws 1989, LB 17, § 1.
Cross References
Penalty for resale of donated foods, see section 28-1483.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-21,189 removes a liability barrier to donating surplus or imperfect food. It defines food broadly, covering articles used for food or drink for humans or animals and their components, and defines raw agricultural product to include any food in its raw or natural state, including fruit that has been washed, colored, or otherwise treated in its unpeeled, natural form before marketing.
With those terms defined, the section protects two different actors in the donation chain. A person who makes a good-faith donation of prepared or perishable food, or raw agricultural products, to a charitable or nonprofit organization is not liable for damages in a civil action for injury or death caused by the food’s condition, so long as the food appeared fit for human consumption when donated. That protection falls away only if the injury or death results directly from the donor’s gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct. Separately, a charitable or nonprofit organization that in good faith receives and distributes such food without charge is not liable, under a strict-liability-in-tort theory, for injury or death from the food’s condition, as long as the organization reasonably determined the food was fit for human consumption when distributed.
The section limits itself to donations that would otherwise go to waste: it applies to good-faith donations of perishable food or raw agricultural products that are not readily marketable because of appearance, freshness, grade, surplus supply, or similar conditions, rather than to food sold or distributed in the ordinary course of commerce.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is a business protected from a lawsuit if it donates food that later turns out to have caused an illness?
Generally yes, if the donation was made in good faith and the food appeared fit for human consumption when donated, unless the injury or death was a direct result of the donor’s gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct.
Does this immunity cover a charity that distributes donated food for free?
Yes, for claims based on strict liability in tort, as long as the organization received and distributed the food in good faith and reasonably determined it was fit for human consumption when distributed.
What counts as a "raw agricultural product" under this section?
Any food in its raw or natural state, including fruit that has been washed, colored, or otherwise treated in its unpeeled natural form before marketing.
Does this section protect food that is sold rather than donated?
No. It applies to good-faith donations of perishable food or raw agricultural products that are not readily marketable, not to food sold in the ordinary course of business.
What breaks the donor’s immunity under this section?
An injury or death that is a direct result of the donor’s gross negligence, recklessness, or intentional misconduct.
Why would food that is not "readily marketable" still be covered by this section?
The section is aimed at food that would otherwise go to waste because of appearance, freshness, grade, surplus supply, or similar conditions, encouraging donation of that food instead.