§ 25-1415.Abatement of actions by death or cessation of powers of representative; duty of court.
Article 14: Revivor and Survival of Actions · Last amended 2018 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-1415
Source
R.S.1867, Code § 468, p. 471; R.S.1913, § 8036; C.S.1922, § 8977; C.S.1929, § 20-1415; R.S.1943, § 25-1415; Laws 2018, LB193, § 22.
Plain-English Summary
Sections 25-1413 and 25-1414 set the one-year windows after which revivor against a defendant’s or a plaintiff’s representatives needs the opposing side’s consent. Section 25-1415 addresses what happens when that consent is not forthcoming and the case has sat too long as a result. When it appears to the court, by affidavit, that a party has been dead, or that a party suing or sued as personal representative has had those powers cease, for a period so long that revivor cannot happen without both parties’ consent, the court must order the action stricken from the trial docket.
This is not discretionary once the predicate is shown — the statute says the court “shall” order the action stricken. It functions as a housekeeping mechanism, clearing dormant cases off the active docket when the death or the cessation of representative powers has gone unaddressed long enough that neither side can force revivor without the other’s agreement, and that agreement has not materialized.
Being stricken from the trial docket is not necessarily the end of the matter forever; §§ 25-1413 and 25-1414 still allow revivor by consent even after the relevant time period has run. Section 25-1415 addresses the docket-management consequence of delay, not a permanent bar on ever reviving the case if the parties later agree.
Frequently Asked Questions
What triggers a court to strike an action from the trial docket under this section?
A showing by affidavit that a party has been dead, or a party’s powers as personal representative have ceased, for so long that revivor cannot happen without both parties’ consent.
Is striking the action from the docket mandatory or discretionary?
The statute directs the court to order it stricken once that showing is made, framing it as a duty rather than a matter of pure discretion.
Does striking an action from the docket mean it can never be revived?
Section 25-1415 addresses removing a dormant case from the active docket; §§ 25-1413 and 25-1414 continue to allow revivor by the consent of both parties even after the relevant time periods have passed.
How does a court find out that a party has been dead long enough to trigger this section?
Through an affidavit presented to the court establishing the death or the cessation of representative powers and the length of time involved.
How does this section relate to §§ 25-1413 and 25-1414?
Those sections set the one-year point after which revivor needs the opposing party’s consent. Section 25-1415 addresses the consequence when that consent-based revivor has not happened and the delay has become long-standing.
Does this section apply to both plaintiffs and defendants?
Yes. It refers generally to either party to an action having died, or to a party suing or being sued as personal representative whose powers have ceased.