RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

§ 25-1340.Standards for recognition of foreign-country judgment.

Article 13: Judgments · Last amended 2021 · Last verified July 22, 2026

In one sentenceThis section states Nebraska’s standards for recognizing a foreign-country money judgment: courts generally must recognize a qualifying judgment, must refuse recognition for due-process or jurisdictional defects, and may refuse recognition on several other listed grounds, with the resisting party bearing the burden of proof.

Full Text of § 25-1340

Text size

(a) Except as otherwise provided in subsections (b) and (c) of this section, a court of this state shall recognize a foreign-country judgment to which the Uniform Foreign-Country Money Judgments Recognition Act applies.
(b) A court of this state may not recognize a foreign-country judgment if:
(1) the judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with the requirements of due process of law;
(2) the foreign court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or
(3) the foreign court did not have jurisdiction over the subject matter.
(c) A court of this state need not recognize a foreign-country judgment if:
(1) the defendant in the proceeding in the foreign court did not receive notice of the proceeding in sufficient time to enable the defendant to defend;
(2) the judgment was obtained by fraud that deprived the losing party of an adequate opportunity to present its case;
(3) the judgment or the cause of action or claim for relief on which the judgment is based is repugnant to the public policy of this state or of the United States;
(4) the judgment conflicts with another final and conclusive judgment;
(5) the proceeding in the foreign court was contrary to an agreement between the parties under which the dispute in question was to be determined otherwise than by proceedings in that foreign court;
(6) in the case of jurisdiction based only on personal service, the foreign court was a seriously inconvenient forum for the trial of the action;
(7) the judgment was rendered in circumstances that raise substantial doubt about the integrity of the rendering court with respect to the judgment; or
(8) the specific proceeding in the foreign court leading to the judgment was not compatible with the requirements of due process of law.
(d) A party resisting recognition of a foreign-country judgment has the burden of establishing that a ground for nonrecognition stated in subsection (b) or (c) of this section exists.

Source

Laws 2021, LB501, § 4.

Plain-English Summary

Section 25-1340 sets out when a Nebraska court recognizes a foreign-country judgment covered by the Act. The default is recognition: except as the section itself provides otherwise, a Nebraska court shall recognize a qualifying foreign-country judgment. Recognition is the starting rule, not the exception.

Three grounds require a court to refuse recognition, without discretion to look past them: the judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with due process; the foreign court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter. Any one of these defeats recognition outright.

A longer list of grounds gives the court discretion, not a mandate, to withhold recognition. These include inadequate notice of the foreign proceeding, a judgment obtained by fraud that denied the losing party a fair chance to present its case, a judgment or underlying claim repugnant to the public policy of Nebraska or the United States, a conflict with another final and conclusive judgment, a prior agreement between the parties that the dispute would be resolved somewhere other than that foreign court, a seriously inconvenient forum where jurisdiction rested only on personal service, serious doubt about the integrity of the rendering court, and a specific proceeding that did not meet due process requirements even if the broader system did.

The burden of proof runs against the resisting party. A party opposing recognition has to establish that one of the grounds for nonrecognition — mandatory or discretionary — exists.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does a Nebraska court have to recognize every foreign-country money judgment?

Generally yes, unless one of the listed exceptions applies.

What grounds force a Nebraska court to refuse recognition?

A foreign judicial system lacking impartial tribunals or due-process-compatible procedures, lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, or lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

What grounds let a Nebraska court refuse recognition but do not require it?

Inadequate notice, fraud that denied a fair opportunity to defend, public policy conflicts, conflicting judgments, a prior agreement to resolve the dispute elsewhere, a seriously inconvenient forum tied to personal-service jurisdiction, doubts about the rendering court’s integrity, and a specific proceeding incompatible with due process.

Who has to prove a ground for nonrecognition exists?

The party resisting recognition of the foreign-country judgment.

Can a Nebraska court refuse recognition just because it disagrees with the foreign judgment’s outcome?

No. Refusal requires one of the specific grounds this section lists, such as a public policy conflict or a jurisdictional defect.

Source & verification. Section text and the amendment-history citation are reproduced verbatim from the Nebraska Legislature, Revisor of Statutes, enacted by the Nebraska Legislature. Last verified July 22, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: recognizing foreign country judgment nebraskagrounds to refuse foreign judgment recognitionforeign judgment due process nebraskamandatory vs discretionary nonrecognition nebraska