§ 25-1340.Standards for recognition of foreign-country judgment.
Article 13: Judgments · Last amended 2021 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-1340
Source
Laws 2021, LB501, § 4.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-1340 sets out when a Nebraska court recognizes a foreign-country judgment covered by the Act. The default is recognition: except as the section itself provides otherwise, a Nebraska court shall recognize a qualifying foreign-country judgment. Recognition is the starting rule, not the exception.
Three grounds require a court to refuse recognition, without discretion to look past them: the judgment was rendered under a judicial system that does not provide impartial tribunals or procedures compatible with due process; the foreign court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant; or the foreign court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter. Any one of these defeats recognition outright.
A longer list of grounds gives the court discretion, not a mandate, to withhold recognition. These include inadequate notice of the foreign proceeding, a judgment obtained by fraud that denied the losing party a fair chance to present its case, a judgment or underlying claim repugnant to the public policy of Nebraska or the United States, a conflict with another final and conclusive judgment, a prior agreement between the parties that the dispute would be resolved somewhere other than that foreign court, a seriously inconvenient forum where jurisdiction rested only on personal service, serious doubt about the integrity of the rendering court, and a specific proceeding that did not meet due process requirements even if the broader system did.
The burden of proof runs against the resisting party. A party opposing recognition has to establish that one of the grounds for nonrecognition — mandatory or discretionary — exists.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a Nebraska court have to recognize every foreign-country money judgment?
Generally yes, unless one of the listed exceptions applies.
What grounds force a Nebraska court to refuse recognition?
A foreign judicial system lacking impartial tribunals or due-process-compatible procedures, lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, or lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.
What grounds let a Nebraska court refuse recognition but do not require it?
Inadequate notice, fraud that denied a fair opportunity to defend, public policy conflicts, conflicting judgments, a prior agreement to resolve the dispute elsewhere, a seriously inconvenient forum tied to personal-service jurisdiction, doubts about the rendering court’s integrity, and a specific proceeding incompatible with due process.
Who has to prove a ground for nonrecognition exists?
The party resisting recognition of the foreign-country judgment.
Can a Nebraska court refuse recognition just because it disagrees with the foreign judgment’s outcome?
No. Refusal requires one of the specific grounds this section lists, such as a public policy conflict or a jurisdictional defect.