§ 25-12,117.Notice; copy of report or finding.
Article 12: Evidence and Witnesses · Last amended 1951 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-12,117
Source
Laws 1951, c. 57, § 3, p. 190.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-12,117 is the procedural safeguard attached to the composite-report rule in section 25-12,115. A report is not admissible under that scheme unless the offering party has given the adverse party reasonable notice, before trial, of the intention to offer it. That notice must come with a copy of the report or finding, or at least the portion of it relating to the controversy.
Notice alone is not enough. The offering party also has to give the adverse party a reasonable opportunity to inspect and copy the records or other documents in the offering party’s possession or control on which the report or finding was based, along with the names of everyone who furnished facts used in preparing it. Those requirements give the adverse party the information needed to prepare a cross-examination or challenge the report’s reliability.
The section builds in one escape hatch: a report can still be admitted despite a failure to give notice if the trial court finds that no substantial injustice would result from that failure. That standard puts the decision in the trial court’s hands rather than making notice an absolute precondition in every case.
Frequently Asked Questions
What has to happen before a party can offer a composite expert report at trial?
The offering party must give the adverse party reasonable notice before trial of the intent to offer it, along with a copy of the report or the relevant portion of it.
Does the adverse party get to see the records the report was based on?
Yes. Section 25-12,117 requires giving the adverse party a reasonable opportunity to inspect and copy the records or documents the report was based on, and the names of everyone who furnished the underlying facts.
What happens if a party forgets to give notice before trial?
The report can still be admitted if the trial court finds that no substantial injustice would result from the failure to give notice; otherwise, the lack of notice defeats admissibility.
How much notice is “reasonable” under this section?
The statute uses the standard of reasonable notice before trial without fixing a specific number of days, leaving the sufficiency of the timing to the circumstances of the case and the trial court’s judgment.
Does the offering party have to reveal the names of everyone who contributed to the report?
Yes, the notice must include the names of all persons who furnished facts on which the report or finding was based.