§ 25-1121.Special verdicts; when allowed; procedure; filing; record.
Article 11: Trial · Last amended 2018 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-1121
Source
R.S.1867, Code § 293, p. 443; R.S.1913, § 7860; C.S.1922, § 8804; C.S.1929, § 20-1121; R.S.1943, § 25-1121; Laws 2018, LB193, § 13.
Plain-English Summary
Section 25-1121 gives juries and courts a choice between two ways of deciding a case: a general verdict, which only names a winner, and a special verdict, which lays out the facts the jury found. In an action for the recovery of money only, or for specific real property, the jury itself decides, in its discretion, whether to return a general or a special verdict.
In every other type of case, the choice shifts to the court. A judge may direct the jury to find a special verdict in writing on all or any of the issues. Even where the jury returns an ordinary general verdict, the court may also instruct it to answer particular written questions of fact, and may direct that those answers be put in writing. This lets a court get a clear record of what the jury decided on a specific factual point, without giving up the general verdict altogether.
Whatever special verdict or finding the jury produces, the statute requires it to be filed with the clerk and entered upon the record. That step preserves the jury’s factual findings as part of the official case file, which matters if those findings later come into conflict with a general verdict under section 25-1121’s companion, section 25-1120.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does the jury get to choose between a general and special verdict on its own?
In actions for the recovery of money only, or for specific real property, the jury may render either a general or a special verdict, in its own discretion.
In other kinds of cases, who decides whether the jury returns a special verdict?
The court does. Section 25-1121 lets a judge direct the jury to find a special verdict in writing on all or any of the issues in cases outside the money-only or specific-real-property categories.
Can a court ask for written answers to specific questions even if the jury also gives a general verdict?
Yes. The statute lets the court instruct the jury, when it renders a general verdict, to also find upon particular questions of fact stated in writing, and to direct a written finding on those questions.
What has to happen to a special verdict or finding after the jury returns it?
It must be filed with the clerk and entered upon the record, preserving it as part of the case file.
What is the point of asking a jury to answer specific factual questions instead of just taking the general verdict?
Specific written answers create a clearer picture of what the jury found on particular issues, which can matter for review or if those findings conflict with the general verdict.
Does a party have to request a special verdict, or can the court order one on its own?
The statute gives the court authority to direct a special verdict or particular findings; it does not limit that authority to situations where a party requests it.