§ 25-1049.Attachment; claims not due; action authorized; when.
Article 10: Attachment, Garnishment, Injunctions, Receivers, and Replevin · Not amended since original codification · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-1049
Source
R.S.1867, Code § 237, p. 432; R.S.1913, § 7778; C.S.1922, § 8722; C.S.1922, § 20-1049; R.S.1943, § 25-1049.
Plain-English Summary
Attachment normally waits for a debt to come due before it can be used. Section 25-1049 carves out an exception for debtors who are actively working to put their assets out of reach. It lets a creditor bring an action on a claim before it is due, and obtain an attachment against the debtor’s property, in three related situations.
The first is where the debtor has already sold, conveyed, or otherwise disposed of property with the fraudulent intent to cheat or defraud creditors, or to hinder or delay them in collecting their debts. The second reaches forward in time: where the debtor is about to make such a sale, conveyance, or disposition with that same fraudulent intent. The third covers a debtor who is about to remove property, or a material part of it, with the intent or to the effect of cheating or defrauding creditors, or of hindering and delaying them.
Notice that the third ground does not require proving fraudulent intent — it is satisfied if the removal has the effect of hindering or delaying creditors, even without proof of what the debtor meant to accomplish. Together, these grounds give a creditor a way to move before a debt is technically due, when waiting would mean watching the debtor’s assets disappear beyond reach.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a creditor sue before the debt is due?
Yes, under this section, when one of the three listed situations involving the debtor’s property applies.
What is the first ground for an early attachment under this section?
The debtor has already sold, conveyed, or otherwise disposed of property with the fraudulent intent to cheat or defraud creditors, or to hinder or delay them in collecting their debts.
What if the debtor has not yet disposed of the property but seems about to?
The second ground covers a debtor who is about to make such a sale, conveyance, or disposition with the same fraudulent intent.
Does the creditor have to prove fraudulent intent under every ground listed here?
No. The third ground — removing property or a material part of it — is satisfied by intent or effect: it applies if the removal has the effect of cheating, defrauding, hindering, or delaying creditors, even without direct proof of fraudulent intent.
What procedure does a creditor follow to get this type of early attachment?
Section 25-1050 sets out the affidavit and procedural requirements for an attachment sought under this section.
What happens if the court refuses to grant this type of attachment?
Section 25-1051 provides that the action must be dismissed without prejudice, and any future action requires a new application for attachment.