§ 25-101.Civil action.
Article 1: Civil Actions Generally · Last amended 1867 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of § 25-101
Source
R.S.1867, Code § 2, p. 394; Laws 1867, § 1, p. 71; R.S.1913, § 7560; C.S.1922, § 8503; C.S.1929, § 20-101; R.S.1943, § 25-101.
Plain-English Summary
Before this code, a person suing over a broken contract used one procedural system — an action at law — while someone seeking an injunction or an accounting used another — a suit in equity. The two tracks had their own pleading forms, their own rules of evidence, and their own vocabulary. Pick the wrong one, and a court could throw the case out even when the underlying claim was sound. Section 25-101 tears that wall down. It abolishes the distinctions between actions at law and suits in equity, and every earlier form those actions took, and puts in their place one form of action: the civil action.
The change traces to the code-pleading reform movement of the mid-1800s, which swept through Nebraska and many other states at roughly the same time. Rather than forcing a plaintiff to match the facts to a historic writ or bill before filing suit, the code lets a plaintiff plead the facts and ask for whatever relief those facts support — legal, equitable, or both — in one lawsuit. A court can still apply legal principles to one part of a case and equitable principles to another, but the plaintiff no longer has to sort the claim into a labeled box first.
Section 25-101 sets no deadlines and creates no independent right. It works as the foundation the rest of Chapter 25 stands on, telling every later section that “action” means one thing in Nebraska: a civil action, whether the underlying claim sounds in law, in equity, or both.
Frequently Asked Questions
What did Nebraska civil litigation look like before this section merged law and equity?
Lawsuits fell into separate systems — actions at law and suits in equity — each with its own forms, procedures, and rules for what a party had to plead. A claim filed under the wrong system risked dismissal regardless of its merits.
Does merging law and equity mean Nebraska courts can no longer grant injunctions or other equitable remedies?
No. Equitable remedies still exist. Section 25-101 merges the procedure used to seek them with the procedure used for legal claims; it does not eliminate any remedy.
Can I ask for money damages and an injunction in the same Nebraska lawsuit?
Yes. Because there is only one form of action, a plaintiff can plead facts supporting both legal and equitable relief in a single civil action rather than filing separate suits.
Does Section 25-101 set any filing deadlines or pleading requirements?
No. It states a structural rule — one form of action — rather than a deadline or a specific pleading standard. Those requirements appear elsewhere in Chapter 25 and in the Nebraska Court Rules.
Is Nebraska’s “civil action” the same idea used in federal court?
The terminology and the underlying merger of law and equity resemble federal practice. Nebraska’s modern pleading and motion practice, however, runs largely through the Nebraska Court Rules rather than through this statute alone.
Why does a statute from the 1800s still matter to a case filed today?
Every civil case pending in Nebraska today still proceeds as the single “civil action” this section created. Later statutes and rules assume that framework rather than restating it.