Rule 96.30.Court Shall Allow Fees, Costs and Expenses.
Part III · Rule 96: Partition of Real and Personal Property · Last amended January 1, 1981 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 96.30
Amendment History
Adopted June 5, 1980, eff. Jan. 1, 1981.
Official Comment
This is new. Compare: Prior Rules 96.51 and 96.59.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 96.30 consolidates the fee and cost allowances that run throughout a partition case into one governing provision. The court must allow a reasonable fee to the attorney who instituted the partition action, recognizing that bringing the suit and shepherding it through the various steps — parties, commissioners, sale, distribution — takes real legal work that benefits everyone with an interest in the property, not just the plaintiff alone.
The rule also lets the court allow a reasonable fee for any guardian ad litem appointed in the case. Given how often partition cases involve parties who are minors, incapacitated, or represented through the appointed-counsel mechanism in Rule 96.04 for unborn or unrepresented future interests, this fee allowance ensures that representation does not go uncompensated.
Beyond attorney and guardian ad litem fees, the court must also allow reasonable costs, expenses, and compensation to the sheriff or commissioner who handled the sale process. All of these amounts — attorney fees, guardian ad litem fees, and sheriff or commissioner costs and expenses — are taxed as costs in the case, folding them into the same cost-allocation framework that covers commissioner and surveyor compensation under Rule 96.13 and recording costs under Rule 96.17.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is entitled to a fee under Rule 96.30?
The attorney who instituted the partition action is entitled to a reasonable fee, and the court may allow a reasonable fee for any guardian ad litem appointed.
Does the court have to allow the attorney fee, or is it discretionary?
The rule states the court shall allow a reasonable fee to the attorney instituting the action, making it a required allowance, not an optional one.
Is a guardian ad litem fee mandatory in every case?
The rule says the court may allow a reasonable fee for any guardian ad litem appointed, framing this as a fee available when a guardian ad litem is appointed.
What other costs does this rule address?
Reasonable costs, expenses, and compensation to the sheriff or commissioner who handled the case.
How are these fees and costs collected?
They are taxed as costs in the case, consistent with the cost allowances found elsewhere in Rule 96.
Why would a guardian ad litem be appointed in a partition case?
Guardians ad litem often become necessary when parties are minors, incapacitated, or otherwise need representation, including situations tied to the appointed-counsel provisions in Rule 96.04.