Rule 84.22.Granting Original Writs.
Part II · Rule 84: Procedure in All Appellate Courts · Last amended January 1, 1995 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 84.22
Amendment History
Adopted June 13, 1979, eff. Jan. 1, 1980. Amended April 26, 1994, eff. Jan. 1, 1995.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 84.22 keeps writ practice from becoming a shortcut around ordinary appeal. No appellate court may issue an original remedial writ in any case where adequate relief can be had by an appeal or by an application for such a writ to a lower court. That adequacy-of-remedy limit channels most disputes toward the normal appellate track instead of an original writ.
The rule adds a jurisdictional restriction for matters collateral to a pending appeal. If a judgment has been entered and an appeal is pending, or the time to appeal it hasn’t yet expired, no appellate court or district may issue an original writ concerning a matter collateral to that appeal unless the appeal is pending in, or would fall within the jurisdiction of, that same court and district. The rule expressly treats a motion filed under Rule 24.035 or Rule 29.15 as a matter collateral to the appeal for this purpose.
Frequently Asked Questions
When will an appellate court decline to issue an original writ?
Whenever adequate relief is available by appeal or by an application for a writ to a lower court.
Can I seek a writ on a matter collateral to my pending appeal from any court I choose?
No, only the court and district that has, or would have, jurisdiction over the appeal may issue it.
Does this restriction apply even if my time to appeal hasn’t expired yet?
Yes, it applies whenever the appeal is pending or the time to appeal it hasn’t yet run.
Are post-conviction motions treated as collateral matters under this rule?
Yes, motions under Rule 24.035 and Rule 29.15 are expressly treated as collateral to the appeal.
What’s the practical effect of this rule?
It keeps original writs from substituting for, or getting around, the ordinary appellate process.