Rule 81.17.Record on Appeal--Reviewing Legal Effect of Instructions, Evidence Not Necessary, When.
Part I · Rule 81: Appeals · Last amended January 1, 1994 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 81.17
Amendment History
Adopted June 13, 1979, eff. Jan. 1, 1980. Amended July 27, 1979; Renumbered from Rule 81.16 and amended June 1, 1993, eff. Jan. 1, 1994.
Plain-English Summary
Rule 81.17 is a narrow shortcut for appeals that turn entirely on jury instructions. When the appellant wants review only of legal questions about instructions given or refused, and reviewing the evidence is not necessary to decide those legal questions, the appellant does not have to include the evidence in the record on appeal at all. Instead, within thirty days after the last notice of appeal is filed, the appellant serves the respondent and files in the appellate court a designation of the parts of the trial record it intends to include and a statement of the issues it intends to raise, including what material fact or facts the evidence tended to prove.
The respondent gets a say. If the respondent thinks other parts of the record are necessary, it has ten days after service of the appellant's statement to serve and file its own designation of additional parts and any additional issues it wants to raise. If the respondent does nothing within that time, that silence is treated as an admission that the appellant's statement is correct and that a transcript of the evidence does not need to be part of the record.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I have to include the trial evidence if I'm only challenging a jury instruction?
Not necessarily. Rule 81.17 lets an appellant skip the evidence when reviewing it is not needed to decide the instruction question.
What do I have to file instead of the evidence?
A designation of the record parts to include and a statement of the issues, including what facts the evidence tended to prove, filed within thirty days after the last notice of appeal.
How long does the respondent have to object to my statement?
Ten days after being served with the appellant's statement.
What happens if the respondent doesn't respond?
The respondent's silence is treated as agreement that the appellant's statement is correct and that no evidence transcript is needed.
When does this shortcut not work?
When reviewing the evidence is necessary to decide the legal questions about the instructions.