Rule 67.01.Dismissal Without Prejudice and With Prejudice.
Part I · Rule 67: Dismissal of Civil Actions · Last amended January 1, 1994 · Last verified July 22, 2026
Full Text of Rule 67.01
Amendment History
Amended Jan. 19, 1973, eff. Sept. 1, 1973; Amended June 5, 1980, eff. Jan. 1, 1981; Amended June 1, 1993, eff. Jan. 1, 1994.
Plain-English Summary
Every dismissal in a Missouri civil case lands in one of two buckets, and Rule 67.01 tells you what each one means. A dismissal without prejudice is not the end of the story — the plaintiff can file the same cause of action again later, subject to whatever other rules or deadlines might apply, such as a statute of limitations. A dismissal with prejudice is final. It bars the plaintiff from asserting that same cause of action or claim against that same party ever again.
This rule doesn't decide which label applies to a given dismissal — that job falls to Rule 67.02 for voluntary dismissals and Rule 67.03 for involuntary ones, along with Rule 67.06 for dismissals that follow a failed opportunity to amend a pleading. Rule 67.01 supplies the vocabulary and the consequence that attaches to each term, so that once a court or a party labels a dismissal as "with prejudice" or "without prejudice," everyone knows exactly what follows.
The distinction matters most at the moment a plaintiff considers filing suit again. A party who received a dismissal without prejudice can typically start over, though a second dismissal on the same claim may come with strings attached under Rule 67.02. A party facing a dismissal with prejudice has no such option — that claim is over, and the only path forward is an appeal of the dismissal itself.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the practical difference between a dismissal with prejudice and one without prejudice?
A dismissal without prejudice leaves the door open to filing the same claim again, while a dismissal with prejudice closes that door for good against that party on that cause of action.
Can I refile a lawsuit after it was dismissed without prejudice?
Generally yes, subject to any other bar that might apply, such as an expired statute of limitations or a limit imposed under Rule 67.02 on a second dismissal of the same claim.
Does Rule 67.01 itself decide whether a dismissal is with or without prejudice?
No. Rule 67.01 defines what each label means, but the default and the procedure for choosing between them come from Rule 67.02 for voluntary dismissals, Rule 67.03 for involuntary ones, and Rule 67.06 for dismissals following a failed amendment.
If my case is dismissed with prejudice, can I still sue a different defendant on the same facts?
Rule 67.01 bars reasserting the same cause of action or claim against the same party — the rule's text is limited to that party, so a dismissal with prejudice doesn't by itself resolve claims against someone else.
Can a dismissal with prejudice be appealed?
A dismissal with prejudice is typically a final, appealable judgment, since it ends the plaintiff's ability to pursue that claim in that case.
Does this rule apply to counterclaims and cross-claims too?
Yes — Rule 67.04 extends Rules 67.01, 67.02, 67.03, and 67.05 to counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party claims.