Rule 306.Default
Last amended March 1, 2024 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 306
Advisory Committee Comments
Advisory Committee Comment--1992 Amendments
Subsections (a) and (b) of this rule are derived from existing Rule 5.01 of the Rules of Family Court Procedure.
Subsection (c) of this rule is derived from existing Rule 5.02 of the Rules of Family Court Procedure.
The default scheduling request required by Rule 306.01, as amended in 1992, serves the purpose of permitting the court administrator’s office to schedule the case for the right type of hearing. It is not otherwise involved in the merits. The affidavit of default is a substantive document establishing entitlement to relief by default.
Advisory Committee Comment—2003 Amendment
Rule 306.01 is amended in 2003 to add a new first clause. The purpose of this change is to include in the rules an express exemption of the proceedings from the requirements of the rule when the parties proceed by Joint Petition, Agreement and Judgment and Decree as allowed by new Rule 302.01(b).
Advisory Committee Comment—2006 Amendment
Rule 306 is amended to clarify the role of the notice required to be given to parties who are in default but who have “appeared” in some way. A party is not entitled to prevent entry of judgment if that party is in default by not serving and filing a timely written answer to the Petition. Nonetheless, the court may, in its discretion, consider some appropriate measures to prevent the case from being decided on a default basis and to obviate a motion for relief from the default judgment and decree. Accordingly, the rule is amended to afford more useful notice as to the request for a default.
The rule does not define how a party might appear either by “a pleading other than an answer,” or “personally without a pleading.” Both conditions should be limited to some actions that approach responding to the Petition despite the fact they may be insufficient as a matter of law to stand as a response. Sending a letter that responds to a Petition might suffice for the first condition, as might a letter to the court. Appearing at a court hearing despite having not answered would certainly meet the “appeared personally” condition. When in doubt as to other circumstances, the party seeking a default should, to comply with Rule 306.01(b), provide the required notice, with the expectation that many of these responses that fall short of an answer will not prevent entry of judgment.
The Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act of 1940 was amended and renamed in 2003, and the rule is amended to use the new name as a matter of convenience. See Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, Pub. L. No. 108-189, § 1, 117 Stat. 2835, 2840-42 (2003) (to be codified at 50 U.S.C. app. § 521). The former rule would still apply, however, because it included the “as amended” extension of the citation.
Advisory Committee Comment—2012 Amendments
Rule 306 attempts to make clear the role of notice required to be given to parties who are in default but who have “appeared” in some way in marriage dissolution proceedings. A party is not entitled to prevent entry of judgment if that party is in default by not serving and filing a timely written answer to the Petition. Nonetheless, the court may, in its discretion, consider some appropriate measures to prevent the case from being decided on a default basis and to obviate a motion for relief from the default judgment and decree. Accordingly, the rule is amended to afford more useful notice as to the request for a default. Defaults in other types of family proceedings are governed by Rule 55 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure.
The rule does not define how a party might appear either by “a pleading other than an answer,” or “personally without a pleading.” Both conditions should be limited to actions that approach responding to the Petition despite the fact they may be insufficient as a matter of law to stand as a response. Sending a letter that responds to a Petition might suffice for the first condition, as might a letter to the court. Appearing at a court hearing despite having not answered would certainly meet the “appeared personally” condition. When in doubt as to other circumstances, the party seeking a default should, to comply with Rule 306.01(b), provide the required notice, with the expectation that many of these responses that fall short of an answer will not prevent entry of judgment.
Task Force Comment--1991 Adoption
This rule is derived from existing Rule 5.03 of the Rules of Family Court Procedure.
Advisory Committee Comment—2003 Amendment
Rule 306.02 is amended in 2003 to add a new first clause. The purpose of this change is to include in the rules an express exemption of the proceedings from the requirements of the rule when the parties proceed by Joint Petition, Agreement and Judgment and Decree as allowed by new Rule 302.01(b).
Advisory Committee Comment—2012 Amendments
Rule 306.02 is abrogated because it sets forth procedures that do not need to be established by rule and in practice individual judges deal with the preparation of a decree in different ways. The court may still require the submission of proposed findings of fact, conclusions of law, order for judgment, and judgment and decree in advance of the hearing.
Amendment History
- (Amended effective March 1, 2024.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 306 walks a party through getting a default judgment when the other side never answered. Unless the case proceeds under a joint petition and combined decree, the moving party submits a Default Scheduling Request on the state court administrator's form to get the matter onto the default calendar, or approved without a hearing at all where the statute allows it.
What else has to be filed depends on what the defaulting party has done. If that party never appeared in any form, the moving party files an affidavit of default along with proof of that party's nonmilitary status, or a signed waiver of rights under the federal law protecting servicemembers. If the defaulting party appeared some other way — through a pleading short of an answer, or by showing up without filing anything — the moving party has to send written notice at least fourteen days before the final hearing, spelling out the hearing date and warning that the court will be asked to grant the relief the petition requests.
When the parties have worked out a stipulation that settles everything, that document goes to the court along with the same nonmilitary-status proof, unless the stipulation already covers it. A party handling the case without a lawyer has to sign a specific waiver acknowledging the right to be represented and giving it up freely before the stipulation becomes the basis for judgment.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does a party get a default judgment in a Minnesota family court case?
By submitting a Default Scheduling Request on the state court administrator's form, along with an affidavit of default and proof of the other party's nonmilitary status, unless a filed stipulation or the joint-petition process applies instead.
How much notice does a defaulting party who has appeared get before a final hearing?
At least fourteen days' written notice of the hearing date and of the moving party's intent to seek judgment, when that party appeared some way short of filing a proper answer.
What is the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act waiver in a default proceeding?
A sworn statement, or a waiver of rights under that federal law, confirming the defaulting party's military status so the court can proceed with a default judgment.
Can a self-represented party stipulate to a family court judgment without a lawyer?
Yes, but that party must sign a specific statement acknowledging the right to a lawyer and freely giving it up before the stipulation supports the judgment.
Does every default proceeding require a hearing?
Not always. Some cases can be approved without a hearing under the applicable statute, using the same Default Scheduling Request process.
Family Court Rules Advisory Committee Commentary*
This stipulation should establish that one of the parties may proceed as if by default, without further notice to or appearance by the other party. The waiver of counsel should be prepared as an addendum following the parties’ signatures on the stipulation.
*Original Advisory Committee Comment--Not kept current.