Rule 301.Scope; Time
Last amended July 1, 2026 · Last verified July 1, 2026
Full Text of Rule 301
Advisory Committee Comments
Advisory Committee Comment—2001 Amendment
Minn. R. Gen. Prac. 351.01 states that the Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules of Evidence, and General Rules of Practice shall apply to proceedings in the expedited process unless inconsistent with the Expedited Child Support Rules, Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 351 through 379. With the exception of Family Court Rules 302.04, 303.05, 303.06, 308.02, and 313, Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 301-313 are inconsistent with the Expedited Child Support Rules and therefore do not apply to the expedited process.
Advisory Committee Comment--2012 Amendments
Rules 301 through 314 were originally derived primarily from the Rules of Family Court Procedure as they existed in 1992. These rules have been revised in several important ways in the ensuing years, and were revised and completely restated in 2011. The prior Advisory Committee Comments have been incorporated into a single set of Advisory Committee Comments for the benefit of the Minnesota Supreme Court as well as for courts and litigants. As is consistently made clear by the orders that have amended the rules, the Advisory Committee Comments are not adopted by the Supreme Court and do not have any official status. They reflect the views of the Supreme Court’s advisory committees that have recommended amendments of the rules from time to time.
Rules 301 through 314 apply in the enumerated proceedings, comprising the majority of types of cases involving family relations. Adoption proceedings are governed by separate Rules of Adoption Procedure, adopted effective January 1, 2005.
Minn. R. Gen. Prac. 351.01 states that the Rules of Civil Procedure, Rules of Evidence, and General Rules of Practice shall apply to proceedings in the expedited process unless inconsistent with the Expedited Child Support Rules, Minn. Gen. R. Prac. 351 through 379. With the exception of Family Court Rules 302.02, 303.05, 308.02, 309, 313 and 314, Rules 301-314 are inconsistent with the Expedited Child Support Rules and therefore do not apply to the expedited process.
Advisory Committee Comment--2026 Amendments
Rule 301.01(b)(4) is amended to reflect a change in statutory citation.
Advisory Committee Comment--2012 Amendments
The rules relating to computation of time are critical, and it is important that they be clear and predictable to all users of the court system. Rule 6 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure provides the appropriate clarity and makes it expressly applicable in family matters thereby eliminating any room for confusion. Rule 6 is consistent with the general day-counting rules set forth in Minn. Stat. § 645.15, and provides additional guidance for counting days where the periods of time are short and for responding to papers served by mail, or facsimile.
The time periods in the rules are intended to apply in most situations. Where unusual circumstances exist and justice so requires, the court may shorten the time limits. See Rule 1.02 of these rules.
Amendment History
- (Amended effective July 1, 2026.)
- (Amended effective May 1, 2012.)
Plain-English Summary
Rule 301 answers the threshold question: is this a family court case at all? It defines a Family Court Action to include marriage dissolution, legal separation, and annulment; child custody disputes and enforcement of custody orders; domestic abuse proceedings; establishing or enforcing child support; proceedings for spousal maintenance or a county reimbursement judgment; contempt arising out of a family case; parentage determinations; third-party custody; and proceedings under the Hague Convention on international child abduction. A judge can also treat other kinds of disputes as family court matters, so this list marks a floor, not a ceiling.
Once a case fits, Rule 301 points to two rulebooks at once. Title IV's own rules control first. Where they say nothing, the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure fill the gap — and where the two conflict, Title IV wins. The rule also folds in how deadlines are counted: Rule 6 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure governs computation of time in every family court case, so a party counting days toward a filing deadline uses the same method as any other civil litigant.
The expedited child support process runs on a separate track with its own rules, and Rule 301 marks the boundary. Most of Title IV, including this rule, does not reach a case handled through that process. A short list of provisions still applies there: the rules on designating parties, on orders to show cause, on notices attached to a decree, on contempt, on confidential numbers, and on parentage proceedings. Anyone unsure which track a support matter is on should check that list before assuming the rest of Title IV controls.
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as a Family Court Action under Rule 301?
Marriage dissolution, legal separation, and annulment; child custody disputes and enforcement; domestic abuse proceedings; child support and parentage matters; contempt in a family case; third-party custody; and international child abduction proceedings under the Hague Convention. A court can also designate other kinds of disputes as family court matters.
Do the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure apply in family court?
Yes, wherever Title IV is silent. The Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure fill any gap these rules leave, but Title IV controls whenever the two conflict.
Does Title IV apply to the expedited child support process?
Mostly not. Rule 301 through Rule 314 generally do not apply to cases in the expedited process, except for the rules on designating parties, orders to show cause, notices attached to a decree, contempt, confidential numbers, and parentage proceedings.
How are deadlines counted in a Minnesota family court case?
The same way they are counted in any other civil case. Rule 6 of the Minnesota Rules of Civil Procedure governs computation of time, and Rule 301 makes that method apply in family court as well.
What happens if Rule 301 conflicts with a Minnesota statute?
The statute controls. Rule 301 applies except where it conflicts with an applicable statute or with the Expedited Child Support Process Rules.
Advisory Committee Comment--1992 Amendments
These rules are derived primarily from the Rules of Family Court Procedure. The advisory committee comments from the Rules of Family Court Procedure are included except where inconsistent with new provisions or where applicable rules are not retained. These rules apply to the following specific types of proceedings that are generally
treated as family court actions:
1. Marriage dissolution, legal separation, and annulment proceedings
(Minnesota Statutes, chapter 518);
2. Child custody enforcement proceedings (Minnesota Statutes, chapter
518A);
3. Domestic abuse proceedings (Minnesota Statutes, chapter 518B);
4. Support enforcement proceedings (Minnesota Statutes, chapter 518C--
R.U.R.E.S.A.);
5. Contempt actions in Family Court (Minnesota Statutes, chapter 588);
6. Parentage determination proceedings (Minnesota Statutes, sections
257.51-.74);
7. Actions for reimbursement of public assistance (Minnesota Statutes,
section 256.87);
8. Withholding of refunds from support debtors (Minnesota Statutes, section
289A.50, subdivision 5);
9. Proceedings to compel payment of child support (Minnesota Statutes,
section 393.07, subdivision 9); and
10. Proceedings for support, maintenance or county reimbursement
judgments (Minnesota Statutes, section 548.091).
Other matters may be heard and treated as family court matters. (Amended
effective January 1, 1993.)