RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 60.Relief from Judgment or Order

Part VII. Judgment · Last verified September 4, 2026

In one sentenceRule 60 lets the court correct clerical mistakes at any time, and relieve a party from a final judgment on six grounds — three of them capped at one year.

Full Text of Rule 60

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b)

(Identical to Mass.R.Civ.P. 60)
(a) Clerical Mistakes. Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record and errors therein arising from oversight or omission may be corrected by the court at any time of its own initiative or on the motion of any party and after such notice, if any, as the court orders. During the pendency of an appeal, such mistakes may be so corrected before the appeal is docketed in the appellate court, and thereafter while the appeal is pending may be so corrected with leave of the appellate court.
(b) Mistake; Inadvertence; Excusable Neglect; Newly Discovered Evidence; Fraud, etc. On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons: (1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged, or a prior judgment upon which it is based has been reversed or otherwise vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application; or (6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment. The motion shall be made within a reasonable time, and for reasons (1), (2), and (3) not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or taken. A motion under this subdivision (b) does not affect the finality of a judgment or suspend its operation. This rule does not limit the power of a court to entertain an independent action to relieve a party from a judgment, order, or proceeding, or to set aside a judgment for fraud upon the court. Writs of review, of error, of audita querela, and petitions to vacate judgment are abolished, and the procedure for obtaining any relief from a judgment shall be by motion as prescribed in these rules or by an independent action.
End

Plain-English Summary

Rule 60 is identical to its civil counterpart and the source says so in a line of its own before subsection (a). It is the route back to a judgment after the Rule 59 windows have closed.

Clerical mistakes

Clerical mistakes in judgments, orders or other parts of the record, and errors arising from oversight or omission, may be corrected at any time — on the court's own initiative or a party's motion, after such notice as the court orders. While an appeal is pending, they may be corrected before the appeal is docketed, and after that only with leave of the appellate court.

The six grounds

On motion and on such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or a legal representative from a final judgment, order or proceeding for:

  1. mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect;
  2. newly discovered evidence which by due diligence could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b);
  3. fraud — whether formerly called intrinsic or extrinsic — misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party;
  4. the judgment is void;
  5. the judgment has been satisfied, released or discharged, a prior judgment on which it is based has been reversed or vacated, or it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application;
  6. any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.

Ground (5)'s prospective-application branch is the one that does the most work in a court whose judgments run forward in time.

Timing, and what a Rule 60 motion does not do

Every motion must be made within a reasonable time, and for grounds (1), (2) and (3) not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or taken. The one-year cap is an outer limit, not a safe harbor — the reasonable-time requirement applies as well.

A Rule 60(b) motion does not affect the finality of a judgment or suspend its operation. Rule 62(b) is the companion: the court may in its discretion stay execution pending disposition of a Rule 60 motion.

The rule preserves an independent action to relieve a party from a judgment and the power to set aside a judgment for fraud upon the court. Writs of review, of error, of audita querela and petitions to vacate judgment are abolished; relief comes by motion under these rules or by independent action.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to move for relief from a judgment?

Within a reasonable time, and for mistake, newly discovered evidence, or fraud, not more than one year after the judgment, order or proceeding was entered or taken. The reasonable-time requirement applies in addition to the one-year cap.

Can a judgment be changed because circumstances have changed?

Rule 60(b)(5) allows relief where it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application, among other grounds in that clause.

Does filing a Rule 60 motion stop the judgment from operating?

No. Rule 60(b) provides that a motion under that subdivision does not affect the finality of a judgment or suspend its operation. Rule 62(b) separately allows the court, in its discretion and on conditions for the security of the adverse party, to stay execution pending disposition of the motion.

Can a clerical error be fixed after the deadlines have passed?

Rule 60(a) allows correction of clerical mistakes and errors arising from oversight or omission at any time, on the court's own initiative or on any party's motion. During an appeal they may be corrected before the appeal is docketed, and thereafter only with leave of the appellate court.

Is there still a writ of error or a petition to vacate judgment?

No. Rule 60(b) abolishes writs of review, of error, of audita querela, and petitions to vacate judgment, and provides that the procedure for obtaining relief from a judgment shall be by motion as prescribed in these rules or by an independent action.

Source & verification. Rule text reproduced verbatim from the Massachusetts Rules of Domestic Relations Procedure as published by the Massachusetts Trial Court Law Libraries, current through amendments effective May 1, 2010. Promulgated by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Last verified September 4, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: relief from judgment60(b)excusable neglectnewly discovered evidencevoid judgmentclerical mistakesvacate judgment