RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Rule 41.Dismissal of Actions

Part VI. Trials · Last amended June 7, 1979 · Last verified September 4, 2026

In one sentenceRule 41 governs dismissal, and it adds a domestic relations route of its own: after a judgment nisi has entered, a stipulation signed by all appearing parties goes straight to a judge, who enters an order of dismissal.

Full Text of Rule 41

Text sizeJump to: (a) (b) (c) (d)

(a) Voluntary Dismissal: Effect Thereof.
(1) By Plaintiff; by Stipulation. Subject to the provisions of these rules and of any statute of this Commonwealth, an action may be dismissed by the plaintiff without order of court (i) by filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer or (ii) that after a judgment nisi has been entered, upon the filing of a stipulation of dismissal signed by all the parties who have appeared in the action, the same shall be presented forthwith to a judge of the Court who shall thereupon enter an order of dismissal. Unless otherwise stated in the notice of dismissal or stipulation, the dismissal is without prejudice, except that a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed in any court of the United States or of this or any other state an action based on or including the same claim.
(2) By Order of Court. Except as provided in paragraph (1) of this subdivision (a), an action shall not be dismissed at the plaintiff's instance save upon order of the court and upon such terms and conditions as the court deems proper. If a counterclaim has been pleaded by a defendant prior to the service upon him of the plaintiff's motion to dismiss, the action shall not be dismissed against the defendant's objection unless the counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication by the court. Unless otherwise specified in the order, a dismissal under this paragraph is without prejudice. (Identical to Mass.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2))
(b) Involuntary Dismissal: Effect Thereof.
(1) On Court's Own Motion. The court may on notice as hereinafter provided at any time, in its discretion, dismiss for lack of prosecution any action which has remained upon the docket for three years preceding said notice without activity shown other than placing upon the trial list, marking for trial, being set down for trial, the filing or withdrawal of an appearance, or the filing of any paper pertaining to discovery. The notice shall state that the action will be dismissed on a day certain, (not less than one year from the date of the notice) unless before that day the case has been tried, heard on the merits, otherwise disposed of, or unless the court on motion with or without notice shall otherwise order. The notice shall be mailed to the plaintiff's attorney of record, or, if there be none, to the plaintiff if his address be known. Otherwise such notice shall be published as directed by the court. Dismissal under this paragraph shall be without prejudice.
(2) On Motion of the Defendant. On motion of the defendant, with notice, the court may, in its discretion, dismiss any action for failure of the plaintiff to prosecute or to comply with these rules or any order of court. After the plaintiff, in an action tried by the court without a jury, has completed the presentation of his evidence, the defendant, without waiving his right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted, may move for a dismissal on the ground that upon the facts and the law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief. The court as trier of the facts may then determine them and render judgment against the plaintiff or may decline to render any judgment until the close of all the evidence. If the court renders judgment on the merits against the plaintiff the court shall make findings as provided in Rule 52(a).
(3) Effect. Unless the dismissal is pursuant to paragraph (1) of this subdivision (b), or unless the court in its order for dismissal otherwise specifies, a dismissal under this subdivision (b) and any dismissal not provided for in this rule, other than a dismissal for lack of jurisdiction, for improper venue, or for failure to join a party under Rule 19, operates as an adjudication upon the merits. (Identical to Mass.R.Civ.P. 41(b))
(c) Dismissal of Counterclaim, Cross-Claim, or Third-Party Claim. The provisions of this rule apply to the dismissal of any counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim. A voluntary dismissal by the claimant alone pursuant to paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of this rule shall be made before a responsive pleading or a motion for summary judgment is served, whichever first occurs, or, if there is none, before the introduction of evidence at the trial or hearing. (Identical to Mass.R.Civ.P. 41(c))
(d) Costs of Previously-Dismissed Action. If a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action in any court commences an action based upon or including the same claim against the same defendant, the court may make such order for the payment of costs of the action previously dismissed as it may deem proper and may stay the proceedings in the action until the plaintiff has complied with the order. (Identical to Mass.R.Civ.P. 41(d))
End

Rule History

Amended January 24, 1978, effective February 21, 1978; amended effective June 7, 1979.

Plain-English Summary

Rule 41 carries the general dismissal machinery with two provisions shaped for this court — one in (a)(1), one in (b)(1).

Voluntary dismissal, including after a judgment nisi

A plaintiff may dismiss without a court order in two situations. The first is the familiar one: filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer. The second has no civil counterpart — after a judgment nisi has been entered, on the filing of a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared, which is presented forthwith to a judge, who thereupon enters an order of dismissal.

That matters because of how a Massachusetts divorce ends. The judgment nisi is not final immediately, and (a)(1)(ii) is the mechanism for unwinding the case in the interval by agreement rather than by motion.

Dismissal is without prejudice unless the notice or stipulation says otherwise — except that a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication on the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed, in any court, an action based on or including the same claim.

Otherwise dismissal at the plaintiff's instance requires a court order on such terms as the court deems proper. Where the defendant has already pleaded a counterclaim, the action is not dismissed over the defendant's objection unless the counterclaim can remain pending for independent adjudication.

Involuntary dismissal, and the three-year docket rule

Subsection (b)(1) lets the court, in its discretion, dismiss for lack of prosecution any action that has sat on the docket for three years without activity — not counting placing on the trial list, marking for trial, being set down for trial, the filing or withdrawal of an appearance, or any discovery paper.

The notice requirement is unusually generous. It must state that the action will be dismissed on a day certain not less than one year from the date of the notice, unless before then the case has been tried, heard on the merits, otherwise disposed of, or the court orders otherwise. It goes to the plaintiff's attorney of record, or to the plaintiff if there is none and the address is known, otherwise by publication as the court directs. Dismissal under this paragraph is without prejudice.

Subsection (b)(2) covers dismissal on the defendant's motion for failure to prosecute or to comply with the rules or an order, and the mid-trial motion after the plaintiff rests in a non-jury trial — where the court as trier of fact may find the facts and render judgment, or wait for the close of all the evidence, and must make Rule 52(a) findings if it enters judgment on the merits.

Subsection (b)(3) sets the default: a dismissal under (b), and any dismissal not provided for in the rule, operates as an adjudication on the merits unless it is under (b)(1), or the court specifies otherwise, or it is for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19.

Subsection (d) lets the court order payment of the costs of a previously dismissed action when the same claim is brought again, and stay the new proceedings until the plaintiff has complied.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can a divorce be dismissed after the judgment nisi?

Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) provides that after a judgment nisi has been entered, upon the filing of a stipulation of dismissal signed by all the parties who have appeared in the action, the stipulation shall be presented forthwith to a judge of the court, who shall thereupon enter an order of dismissal.

When can a plaintiff dismiss without a court order?

By filing a notice of dismissal at any time before service by the adverse party of an answer, or by the judgment-nisi stipulation route in Rule 41(a)(1)(ii).

Is a voluntary dismissal with or without prejudice?

Without prejudice unless the notice or stipulation states otherwise — except that a notice of dismissal operates as an adjudication upon the merits when filed by a plaintiff who has once dismissed, in any court of the United States or of this or any other state, an action based on or including the same claim.

Can a case be dismissed for sitting on the docket?

Rule 41(b)(1) allows the court, in its discretion, to dismiss for lack of prosecution any action that has remained on the docket for three years without activity other than placing on the trial list, marking for trial, being set down for trial, the filing or withdrawal of an appearance, or the filing of any discovery paper. The notice must set a day certain not less than one year away, and dismissal under that paragraph is without prejudice.

Does a dismissal count as a decision on the merits?

Under Rule 41(b)(3), a dismissal under subdivision (b) and any dismissal not provided for in the rule operates as an adjudication upon the merits — unless it is under (b)(1), or the court's order specifies otherwise, or the dismissal is for lack of jurisdiction, improper venue, or failure to join a party under Rule 19.

Can I be made to pay for a case I dismissed before?

Rule 41(d) allows the court, where a plaintiff who has once dismissed an action commences another based on or including the same claim against the same defendant, to order payment of the costs of the previously dismissed action and to stay the new proceedings until the plaintiff has complied.

Source & verification. Rule text and Rule History reproduced verbatim from the Massachusetts Rules of Domestic Relations Procedure as published by the Massachusetts Trial Court Law Libraries, current through amendments effective May 1, 2010. Promulgated by the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts. Last verified September 4, 2026. · Official text
Also known as: dismissal of actionsvoluntary dismissalinvoluntary dismissallack of prosecutionjudgment nisistipulation of dismissalthree year ruledismissing a divorcedivorce