Rule 13.Counterclaim and Cross-Complaint
Part III. Pleadings and Motions · Last amended February 12, 1979 · Last verified September 4, 2026
Full Text of Rule 13
Rule History
Amended January 16, 1979, effective February 12, 1979.
Plain-English Summary
Subsections (a) through (i) track the civil rule. Subsection (j) does not exist there at all, and it is the reason to read this rule.
The cross-complaint for divorce
Subsection (j) provides that in a contested action for divorce, if the defendant pays the proper entry fee and at any time prior to the conclusion of the hearing causes a cross-complaint for divorce to be entered, the court shall allow the entry — after such notice or service to the new defendant as the court in its discretion orders.
Three things are doing work in that sentence. The window runs to the conclusion of the hearing, not to some earlier pleading deadline. The verb is shall, so entry is not discretionary once the fee is paid and the timing is met. And what the court retains discretion over is the notice or service that follows, not whether to allow the cross-complaint.
Compulsory and permissive counterclaims
Subsection (a) makes a counterclaim compulsory where the claim is one the court has power to give, the pleader has it against an opposing party at the time of serving the pleading, and it arises out of the same transaction or occurrence — unless adjudicating it would require third parties over whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction, or it is an action required by law to be brought in another county. Two exceptions follow: the claim need not be stated if it was already the subject of another pending action when this one was commenced, or if the opposing party sued by attachment or other process that did not give the court jurisdiction to render a personal judgment and the pleader is asserting no counterclaim under the rule.
Subsection (b) allows any claim against an opposing party as a permissive counterclaim. Subsection (c) provides that a counterclaim may exceed the opposing claim in amount or differ in kind. Subsection (d) preserves the existing limits on counterclaims against the Commonwealth and its subdivisions, officers and agencies.
Late and omitted counterclaims
Subsection (e) allows a claim that matured or was acquired after the pleading was served to be presented, with the court's permission, by supplemental pleading. Subsection (f) allows a counterclaim omitted through oversight, inadvertence or excusable neglect — or where justice requires — to be set up by amendment with leave of court.
Cross-claims and parties
Subsection (g) allows a cross-claim against a co-party arising out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the original action or of a counterclaim, or relating to property that is the subject matter of the original action, including a claim that the co-party is or may be liable for all or part of a claim asserted against the cross-claimant. Subsection (h) allows additional parties to be brought in under Rules 19 and 20 — though Rule 20 is deleted from this set. Subsection (i) allows judgment on a counterclaim or cross-claim under Rule 54(b) where the court has jurisdiction, even if the opposing party's claims have been dismissed or otherwise disposed of.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can a divorce defendant file their own complaint for divorce?
Rule 13(j) provides for it. In a contested action for divorce, if the defendant pays the proper entry fee and at any time before the conclusion of the hearing causes a cross-complaint for divorce to be entered, the court shall allow the entry, after such notice or service to the new defendant as the court in its discretion orders.
How late can a cross-complaint for divorce be entered?
The rule sets the outer limit at the conclusion of the hearing. That is later than an ordinary pleading deadline, and the entry fee has to be paid.
When is a counterclaim compulsory?
Under Rule 13(a), when at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has a claim against an opposing party that the court has power to give and that arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party's claim — and adjudicating it neither requires third parties beyond the court's jurisdiction nor constitutes an action required by law to be brought in another county.
What if I forget a counterclaim?
Rule 13(f) allows a counterclaim omitted through oversight, inadvertence or excusable neglect, or where justice requires, to be set up by amendment with leave of court.
Can a counterclaim be bigger than the original claim?
Yes. Rule 13(c) provides that a counterclaim may or may not diminish or defeat the recovery sought by the opposing party, and may claim relief exceeding in amount or differing in kind from that sought in the opposing party's pleading.