Art. 971.Special Motion to Strike
Book II. Ordinary Proceedings · Title I. Pleading · Chapter 4. Written Motions · Last amended 2012 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 971
Amendment History
Acts 1999, No. 734, §1; Acts 2004, No. 232, §1; Acts 2012, No. 449, §1.
Plain-English Summary
Article 971 is Louisiana's answer to lawsuits filed to punish someone for speaking out or petitioning the government, rather than to redress genuine harm. When a claim arises from an act in furtherance of the defendant's right to petition or free speech, under either the federal or Louisiana constitution, on a public issue, the defendant can bring a special motion to strike that claim — and the plaintiff loses unless he can show a probability of success on the merits. The court decides that question from the pleadings and any supporting or opposing affidavits, not a full trial, and if the plaintiff clears that bar, the ruling itself becomes admissible evidence later in the case.
The article backs the motion with real consequences on both sides. A party who prevails on the special motion gets attorney fees and costs, which discourages both filing a meritless speech-related claim and filing a meritless motion to strike a legitimate one. And once the motion is filed, discovery in the case stops automatically, though the court can still allow specific discovery on a noticed motion for good cause — protecting a defendant from the cost of litigating a case that may not survive the motion at all.
Paragraph F defines an act in furtherance of the right of petition or free speech broadly: statements made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding; statements connected to an issue those bodies are considering; statements made in a public place or forum on a matter of public interest; and any other conduct that furthers petition or speech rights on a public issue. The article also reaches beyond a defendant in name only — a plaintiff in a reconventional demand can use the special motion to strike against a claim brought against him, just as an original defendant can.
One carve-out matters for anyone worried the article could shield genuine wrongdoing: it doesn't apply to an enforcement action brought by the state's attorney general, a district attorney, or a city attorney acting as a public prosecutor. Government enforcement of the law isn't the kind of lawsuit Article 971 was built to slow down.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a special motion to strike under Article 971?
A motion that lets a defendant strike a claim that arises from the defendant's exercise of free speech or the right to petition the government on a public issue, unless the plaintiff shows a probability of success on the claim.
How quickly does a special motion to strike have to be filed?
Generally within 90 days of service of the petition, though the court has discretion to allow it later on proper terms.
Does filing a special motion to strike stop discovery in the case?
Yes. Filing the motion automatically stays discovery until the ruling is entered, though the court can allow specific discovery for good cause shown.
Who is exempt from a special motion to strike?
Enforcement actions brought by the attorney general, a district attorney, or a city attorney acting as a public prosecutor aren't subject to the special motion to strike.
Can a prevailing defendant recover attorney fees on a special motion to strike?
Yes. Article 971(B) awards reasonable attorney fees and costs to whichever party prevails on the motion.