Art. 697.Subrogor and Subrogee
Title III. Parties · Chapter 2. Parties Plaintiff · Amendment history unavailable · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 697
Plain-English Summary
Subrogation lets one person, the subrogee, step into another person's shoes, the subrogor, with respect to an incorporeal right — often after paying a debt the subrogor owed, or was owed, and taking over the corresponding right by agreement or automatically under the law. Article 697 sets out who has to sue to enforce that right afterward, and the answer depends on how much of the right changed hands.
When the subrogation is partial — the subrogee only stepped into part of the original right — both the subrogor and the subrogee must join in enforcing it judicially, since each still holds a piece of the underlying right. When the entire right has been subrogated, the subrogee alone can sue, because the subrogor no longer retains any share of the right to protect.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between a subrogor and a subrogee?
The subrogor is the person whose right is subrogated; the subrogee is the person who takes over that right, whether by agreement or by operation of law.
Do both parties need to sue together after a subrogation?
Only when the subrogation is partial. If the entire right has been subrogated, the subrogee can sue alone under Article 697.
Does it matter whether the subrogation happened by contract or automatically under the law?
No. Article 697 applies the same joinder rule whether the subrogation is conventional, meaning by agreement, or arises by effect of law.