Art. 5091.Appointment; Contradictory Proceedings Against Attorney; Improper Designation Immaterial
Book IX. Miscellaneous Provisions and Definitions · Title I. Miscellaneous Provisions · Chapter 2. Attorney Appointed to Represent Unrepresented Defendants · Last amended 1999 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 5091
Amendment History
Amended by Acts 1964, No. 4, §1; Acts 1991, No. 366, §1, eff. 7/6/1991; Acts 1992, No. 584, §2; Acts 1997, No. 578, §1; Acts 1999, No. 145, §2.
Plain-English Summary
Article 5091 is the general, Code-wide rule for a problem that recurs throughout Louisiana civil practice: what happens when a defendant cannot be found, cannot defend personally, or does not otherwise exist as a person capable of being sued. Rather than letting the case stall, the article requires the court, on the plaintiff's petition or ex parte written motion, to appoint an attorney to represent that defendant, so the litigation can proceed against someone equipped to answer for the defendant's interests.
Paragraph A covers personal, property, and status jurisdiction over a defendant who is a nonresident or absentee never served with process and who has not waived the objection to jurisdiction; an unemancipated minor or mental incompetent without a legal representative; or a deceased defendant for whose succession no representative has yet been appointed. Paragraph A(2) covers a parallel set of in rem scenarios: a deceased defendant whose heirs and legatees have not been judicially sent into possession, a corporation, limited liability company, or partnership that cannot be served for any reason, and a defendant whose property sits under an administration whose legal representative has died, resigned, been removed, or left the state permanently without a qualified successor. Once appointed, the proceeding is conducted contradictorily against that attorney, who stands in, for the limited purpose of the action, as though duly appointed to represent the decedent's succession.
Paragraphs C and D then protect the appointment from a purely titular mistake. Calling the appointed attorney a curator ad hoc, a tutor ad hoc, a special tutor, or some other label does not affect the proceeding's validity, and neither does an imprecise way of naming the defendant in an in rem action, so long as the designation used would identify the party to a reasonably prudent person.
This site has already encountered narrower, situation-specific versions of this same mechanism: an attorney appointed for an unrepresented defendant in an executory proceeding, and an attorney appointed for absent heirs and legatees in a succession. Article 5091 is where that recurring device comes from in its general, master form, with the remaining articles of this Chapter filling in the appointed attorney's qualifications, duties, and compensation.
Frequently Asked Questions
When must a Louisiana court appoint an attorney to represent a defendant?
Article 5091 requires it when the defendant is a nonresident or absentee not served with process, an unrepresented minor or mental incompetent, deceased without a succession representative, or falls into one of several in rem categories such as an unservable business entity or property under an administration lacking a qualified representative.
Does calling the appointed attorney a "curator ad hoc" instead of some other title matter?
No. Article 5091(C) provides that an improper designation of the attorney, whether as curator ad hoc, tutor ad hoc, special tutor, or any other title, does not affect the proceeding's validity.
Is this the same rule used to appoint an attorney in executory proceedings and successions?
Article 5091 is the general, Code-wide version of the same mechanism this site covers in narrower form elsewhere, such as the attorney appointed for an unrepresented defendant in executory process or for absent heirs and legatees in a succession.
What happens once an attorney is appointed under Article 5091?
The case proceeds contradictorily against that attorney, who represents the defendant's interests for the litigation, including, for a deceased defendant, standing in for the succession to the same extent as a regularly appointed administrator or executor would.
Can a small error in naming a corporate defendant in an in rem action void the case?
No. Article 5091(D) protects a designation of a corporation or partnership that would identify it to a reasonably prudent person, even if the name contains errors.