RulesofCivilProcedure.com Civil Procedure · Every State

Art. 4857.Traffic Court of New Orleans; Appellate Jurisdiction

Book VIII. Trial Courts of Limited Jurisdiction · Title I. General Dispositions · Chapter 2. Civil Jurisdiction · Enacted 2012 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 30, 2026

In one sentenceArticle 4857 gives the Traffic Court of New Orleans exclusive appellate jurisdiction, with de novo review, over appeals from an administrative hearing officer's decision on a traffic violation caught by New Orleans' automated camera enforcement system, subject to a thirty-day filing deadline.

Full Text of Art. 4857

Text size

The Traffic Court of New Orleans shall have exclusive appellate jurisdiction of all appeals by any person aggrieved by an administrative hearing officer's decision concerning a traffic violation enforced by the city of New Orleans' automated traffic enforcement system. Any aggrieved person shall file such appeal within thirty days after the date of such decision. The traffic court shall have de novo review over such appeals. The traffic court shall adopt rules regulating the manner of taking, hearing, and deciding such appeals. All traffic violations on appeal shall maintain their status as civil penalties.

Amendment History

Acts 2012, No. 502, §1.

Plain-English Summary

The Traffic Court of New Orleans is not part of the general parish-and-city-court framework covered by the rest of this chapter. It is a specialized municipal court, and Article 4857 gives it a narrow, specific job: exclusive appellate jurisdiction over appeals from an administrative hearing officer's decision on a traffic violation caught by New Orleans' automated enforcement system, the network of cameras that catch red-light and speeding violations without an officer present.

Someone who disputes an automated citation first has that dispute decided by an administrative hearing officer. Article 4857 lets the Traffic Court review that officer's decision on appeal, and unlike the record-based appeal to the First or Second City Court described in Article 4850.2, this review is de novo: the Traffic Court looks at the matter fresh, rather than deferring to the hearing officer's findings.

An aggrieved person has thirty days from the hearing officer's decision to file the appeal, and the Traffic Court adopts its own rules governing how these appeals are taken, heard, and decided. As with the further appeal under Article 4850.2, the underlying violation keeps its status as a civil penalty throughout the appellate process, rather than converting into a criminal charge.

Frequently Asked Questions

What does the Traffic Court of New Orleans have jurisdiction over?

Exclusive appellate jurisdiction over appeals from an administrative hearing officer's decision on a traffic violation caught by New Orleans' automated traffic enforcement system, such as red-light and speed cameras.

Is the Traffic Court of New Orleans's review of a camera ticket a fresh look or based on the existing record?

It is de novo review. Article 4857 has the Traffic Court examine the matter fresh, unlike the record-based further appeal to the First or Second City Court under Article 4850.2.

How long do I have to appeal an automated traffic citation decision in New Orleans?

Thirty days from the date of the administrative hearing officer's decision.

Does an automated traffic violation become a criminal matter on appeal?

No. Article 4857 states that all traffic violations on appeal keep their status as civil penalties.

Source & verification. Article text is reproduced verbatim from the Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure (legis.la.gov). Enacted by the Louisiana Legislature. Last verified July 30, 2026. · Official source
Also known as: Traffic Court of New Orleans jurisdictionArticle 4857 Louisianaautomated traffic enforcement appeal New Orleansde novo review traffic camera ticket Louisianaappeal red light camera ticket New Orleans