Art. 371.Attorney
Title I. Courts · Chapter 7. Other Officers of the Court · Last amended 2025 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 371
Amendment History
Amended by Acts 2025, No. 250, §3, eff. 8/1/2025.
Plain-English Summary
Article 371 starts from a premise that shapes how Louisiana lawyers are expected to behave in court: an attorney is not only a client's advocate but also an officer of the court, owing independent duties to the judicial system itself. That status requires an attorney to act at all times with decorum, in a manner consistent with the dignity and authority of the court and the role an attorney should play in the administration of justice.
The article then gets specific. An attorney must treat the court, its officers, jurors, witnesses, the opposing party, and opposing counsel with due respect, must not interrupt opposing counsel or otherwise interfere with the orderly dispatch of judicial business, must not knowingly encourage or produce false evidence, and must not knowingly misrepresent facts to or deceive the court.
A 2025 amendment added a duty aimed squarely at a modern problem: evidence that has been artificially generated or altered. An attorney must exercise reasonable diligence to verify the authenticity of evidence before offering it to the court, and offering evidence the attorney knew or should have known was false or artificially manipulated, without disclosing that fact, counts as a violation.
Violating any part of Article 371 exposes the attorney to punishment for contempt of court, on top of whatever further disciplinary action other law, including bar discipline, provides.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does it mean for an attorney to be an "officer of the court"?
It means the attorney owes duties to the judicial system itself, not only to the client, including decorum, respect toward the court and opposing counsel, and honesty in dealing with the court.
Can an attorney be punished for offering evidence that turns out to be AI-generated or manipulated?
Yes. Article 371(C), added in 2025, requires reasonable diligence to verify authenticity before offering evidence, and offering evidence the attorney knew or should have known was false or artificially manipulated, without disclosure, is a violation.
What kind of respect does Article 371 require toward opposing counsel?
An attorney must treat opposing counsel with due respect and must not interrupt or otherwise interfere with or impede the orderly dispatch of judicial business.
What happens if an attorney violates Article 371?
The attorney is subject to punishment for contempt of court and to further disciplinary action as otherwise provided by law.