Art. 3062.Effect of Judgment of Possession
Book VI. Probate Procedure · Title II. Acceptance of Successions Without Administration · Chapter 3. Judgments of Possession · Amendment history unavailable · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 3062
Plain-English Summary
Article 3062 defines what a judgment of possession is worth once it has been signed. It is prima facie evidence of the recognized parties' relationship to the deceased, whether as heir, legatee, surviving spouse in community, or usufructuary, and of their right to possess the estate.
Prima facie evidence stands unless someone successfully rebuts it; it is not a final, unchallengeable adjudication that closes the door on every later question. That distinction matters because a judgment of possession usually issues through the streamlined, ex parte process, without a contradictory trial testing the underlying facts. An heir who was left out, a creditor with an unresolved claim, or anyone with a competing right can still come forward and challenge what the judgment recognized, including through the annulment process Article 3008 provides when required security goes unfurnished.
In everyday practice, though, the judgment functions as the operative proof of ownership. Title companies, buyers, banks, and other third parties dealing with succession property rely on a judgment of possession as reliable evidence of who owns what, even knowing that reliance rests on prima facie status rather than absolute finality.
Frequently Asked Questions
What legal weight does a judgment of possession carry under Article 3062?
It is prima facie evidence of the recognized parties' relationship to the deceased and of their right to possess the estate.
Can a judgment of possession be challenged after it is signed?
Yes. Because it is prima facie evidence rather than a final, unchallengeable adjudication, and because it usually issues without a contradictory trial, it can be rebutted later.
Can a buyer of succession property rely on a judgment of possession as proof of ownership?
In practice, yes. Third parties commonly treat it as reliable evidence of ownership, even though it remains subject to challenge.