Art. 2973.Responsive Pleadings to Opposition
Book VI. Probate Procedure · Title I. General Dispositions · Chapter 6. General Rules of Procedure · Amendment history unavailable · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 2973
Plain-English Summary
Once someone files an opposition under Article 2972, the party whose petition, motion, or application is being contested may want to answer back. Article 2973 gives that party the option, pointing to Article 2593 for the mechanics rather than setting out a separate procedure of its own.
Article 2593 is the Code's general rule for responsive pleadings in summary proceedings, the same faster-moving, less formal track that succession oppositions and contradictory motions typically follow. Borrowing that procedure keeps succession practice consistent with how contested matters get answered elsewhere in Louisiana civil procedure, rather than creating a separate, succession-specific set of rules for what is, in substance, the same kind of contradictory dispute.
The word choice matters: a responsive pleading to an opposition is permitted, not required. A party facing an opposition can choose to respond in writing, or can wait and address the opponent's arguments at the hearing on the opposition itself.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I respond in writing to an opposition filed against my succession petition?
Yes. Article 2973 lets a party file a responsive pleading, following the same procedure Article 2593 sets out for summary proceedings.
Is filing a responsive pleading to an opposition mandatory?
No. Article 2973 says a responsive pleading may be filed, leaving the choice to the party facing the opposition.
Why does Article 2973 rely on the summary-proceeding rules instead of a succession-specific procedure?
Because succession oppositions are themselves handled as contradictory matters on the summary-proceeding track, so the Code applies the same responsive-pleading framework used for summary proceedings generally.