Art. 2595.Trial; Decision
Book V. Summary and Executory Proceedings · Title I. Summary Proceedings · Chapter 1. Summary Proceedings · Last amended 2025 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 2595
Amendment History
Amended by Acts 2025, No. 250, §3, eff. 8/1/2025.
Plain-English Summary
Speed is the point of a summary proceeding, and Article 2595 builds it into both the scheduling and the decision. Paragraph A requires the proceeding to be tried by preference over ordinary proceedings — meaning it jumps ahead of the ordinary docket — once reasonable notice has been given, and it is tried without a jury unless another law says otherwise.
Paragraph B carries that urgency through to the ruling itself. The court has to decide the matter as soon as practicable once trial concludes, and, whenever practicable, it has to decide without taking the matter under advisement — that is, without setting the case aside to deliberate and issue a written ruling later. The goal is a prompt answer, delivered close to the hearing itself rather than after an open-ended period of reflection.
Taken together, the two paragraphs describe a proceeding that moves to the front of the line and produces a result quickly once it gets there. That combination is what separates the matters Article 2592 routes onto this track from the ordinary lawsuits that make up the bulk of Louisiana civil litigation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a summary proceeding get priority over other cases on a Louisiana court's docket?
Yes. Article 2595(A) requires a summary proceeding to be tried by preference over ordinary proceedings, once reasonable notice has been given.
Is a summary proceeding tried before a jury?
No, generally. Article 2595(A) requires a summary proceeding to be tried without a jury, except where another law provides otherwise.
How quickly does a Louisiana court have to decide a summary proceeding?
As soon as practicable after trial concludes, and, whenever practicable, without taking the matter under advisement, under Article 2595(B).
What does it mean for a court to decide a case 'without taking the matter under advisement'?
It means the court rules close to the hearing itself rather than setting the case aside to deliberate and issue a written decision later, which keeps a summary proceeding moving at the pace Article 2591 contemplates.