Art. 2380.Loss of Recourse When Purchaser Fails to Give Judgment Debtor Timely Notice
Book IV. Execution of Judgments · Title II. Money Judgments · Chapter 3. The Adjudication and Its Effect · Amendment history unavailable · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 2380
Plain-English Summary
Article 2379's reimbursement right is not unconditional. Article 2380 attaches a notice requirement modeled on the ordinary warranty against eviction found elsewhere in Louisiana sales law: when someone sues the purchaser to evict him, in the property sense of a third party asserting superior ownership, the purchaser has to bring the judgment debtor into the loop in time to defend.
The reasoning is one of fairness to the debtor and the seizing creditor. If the debtor could have defeated the eviction suit had he known about it, but never got the chance because the purchaser sat on the notice, the purchaser should not then be able to turn around and demand reimbursement for a loss the debtor might have prevented.
Two things have to be true for the purchaser to lose this right: the purchaser neglected to notify the debtor in time to defend, and the debtor could have successfully defended the eviction suit if given that chance. A purchaser who gives timely notice, or whose loss would have happened regardless of notice, keeps the recourse Article 2379 provides.
Frequently Asked Questions
What must a purchaser do to preserve reimbursement rights when sued for eviction?
Notify the judgment debtor of the eviction suit in time for the debtor to defend it. Article 2380 takes away the Article 2379 reimbursement right when the purchaser neglects that notice.
Does failing to notify the judgment debtor always defeat the purchaser's recourse?
No. Article 2380 requires both a failure to give timely notice and proof that the judgment debtor could have successfully defended the eviction suit had he been notified.
Why does Louisiana law require notice to the judgment debtor in this situation?
Because the debtor may have a valid defense to the eviction suit, and it would be unfair to let the purchaser skip that opportunity and still recover reimbursement for a loss the debtor might have prevented.
Is this notice requirement similar to anything in ordinary Louisiana sales law?
Yes. It mirrors the notice obligation tied to the warranty against eviction in an ordinary sale, requiring the buyer to call the seller into the defense of a suit challenging title.