Art. 197.Testimony of Inmates
Title I. Courts · Chapter 4. Power and Authority · Last amended 2001 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 197
Amendment History
Added by Acts 1975, No. 403, §1; Acts 2001, No. 842, §1, eff. 6/26/2001.
Plain-English Summary
Article 197 addresses a practical problem: what happens when a witness or party to a civil proceeding is confined in a prison, jail, or correctional or training institution. Paragraph A defines “inmate” broadly to include a person held while awaiting disposition of criminal charges, serving a sentence after conviction, or held under a juvenile court judgment.
Paragraph B identifies when the article applies — when the law requires an inmate’s testimony in open court, when an inmate party has a legal right to be present at some stage of the proceeding, or when a party timely requests the inmate witness’s presence and the circumstances justify it. In any of those situations, the trial judge has discretion to choose among three approaches, in ascending order of logistical burden.
The judge may convene the court, or conduct the proceeding, at the institution where the inmate is held. The judge may instead take the testimony, or conduct the proceeding, by teleconference, video link, or other remote technology the judge approves, or by telephone if every party agrees and the judge approves. Only if the interests of justice require the inmate’s presence in open court, and no other method under this article is workable, may the judge order the inmate transported to the courthouse under R.S. 15:706(D). The article’s structure favors the options that avoid the security and logistical costs of transport, reserving that step for cases where nothing else will do.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who counts as an “inmate” under Article 197?
A person confined in a prison, jail, or correctional or training institution operated by the state, a political subdivision, or a sheriff — whether awaiting trial, serving a sentence after conviction, or held under a juvenile court judgment.
Does an inmate witness always have to be transported to the courthouse to testify?
No. Article 197 favors alternatives — testimony taken at the institution, or by teleconference, video link, or other remote technology — and allows transport to the courthouse only when the interests of justice require the inmate’s physical presence and no other method is workable.
Can inmate testimony be taken by phone?
Yes, but only if every party agrees to it and the judge approves.
Does the judge have to grant an inmate’s request to appear in court?
The trial judge has discretion under Article 197. Even where an inmate has some right to be present, or a party has timely requested the inmate’s presence, the judge chooses which of the article’s methods to use.