Art. 1468.Requests For Admissions; Effect of Admission
Book II. Ordinary Proceedings · Title III. Production of Evidence · Chapter 3. Discovery · Enacted 1976 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 1468
Amendment History
Acts 1976, No. 574, §1.
Plain-English Summary
An admission made in response to a request for admission isn't just useful evidence -- Article 1468 makes it conclusively established for the case, full stop, unless the court permits it to be withdrawn or amended. That's a deliberate choice: the whole point of requests for admission is to let parties rely on what the other side has conceded, without relitigating it later.
The court won't grant withdrawal or amendment lightly. It can do so when allowing the change would serve the presentation of the case on its merits, and the party who obtained the admission fails to show that withdrawing it would prejudice that party's ability to maintain its claim or defense on the merits. Any such change is also subject to Article 1551's rules on amending a pretrial order.
The article also draws a firm boundary around admissions: whatever a party admits under Articles 1466 and 1467 counts only for the case in which it was made. It isn't an admission for any other purpose, and it can't be used against that party in any other proceeding.
Frequently Asked Questions
Once I admit something under a request for admission, can I take it back?
Only with the court's permission, and only if allowing the change serves the merits and doesn't leave the other side unfairly prejudiced.
Can an admission I made in one lawsuit be used against me in a different case?
No. Admissions made under Article 1466 or 1467 apply only to the pending action in which they were made.
What does 'conclusively established' mean in practice?
The admitted matter is treated as settled fact in the case; the other party doesn't have to prove it, and it generally can't be contested at trial.