Art. 1459.Interrogatories to Parties; Scope; Use At Trial
Book II. Ordinary Proceedings · Title III. Production of Evidence · Chapter 3. Discovery · Enacted 1976 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 1459
Amendment History
Acts 1976, No. 574, §1.
Plain-English Summary
Article 1459 is short but does real work: it defines what interrogatories can ask about by pointing to Louisiana's general discovery-scope articles, which allow inquiry into any relevant, non-privileged matter bearing on the case. Rather than repeat that standard, this article incorporates it, so the scope of permissible interrogatories tracks the scope of discovery generally.
The second half addresses what happens to the answers later. Once a party has sworn to an interrogatory answer, that answer can be offered at trial -- most often to show what the answering party has already admitted, or to highlight an inconsistency with later testimony. But this article doesn't make every answer automatically admissible; ordinary evidentiary rules on relevance, hearsay, and the like still apply to whether and how the answer comes in.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I ask about anything I want in interrogatories?
No. The questions have to fall within Louisiana's general discovery scope -- relevant, non-privileged matters bearing on the case, not an unlimited range of topics.
Can answers to interrogatories be used as evidence at trial?
Yes, Article 1459 allows it, but only to the extent the ordinary rules of evidence permit.
Does that mean interrogatory answers come into evidence automatically?
No. A sworn answer is admissible material, but it still has to clear the usual evidentiary hurdles, such as relevance, before a judge lets it in.