Art. 1456.Objection As to Completion and Return of Deposition
Book II. Ordinary Proceedings · Title III. Production of Evidence · Chapter 3. Discovery · Enacted 1976 · no amendments on record · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 1456
Amendment History
Acts 1976, No. 574, §1.
Plain-English Summary
Article 1456 is the cleanup provision for the back end of the deposition process. After a deposition is taken, plenty can still go wrong on the paperwork side — the transcript might be prepared incorrectly, the officer's signing or certification might be irregular, the sealing, endorsing, transmitting, or filing might not follow the procedures set out in Articles 1437 through 1449. This article treats those handling errors as waived unless a party moves to suppress the deposition, in whole or in part, with reasonable promptness after the defect is discovered or should have been discovered through due diligence.
The motion to suppress is the vehicle this article and Article 1445 both point to: it is the procedural tool for challenging a deposition on grounds like these, rather than raising the problem informally or waiting to see if it matters. The promptness standard does not set a fixed number of days; it asks whether the moving party acted with reasonable speed once the defect came to light, which keeps the rule flexible while still discouraging a party from sitting on a known problem until it becomes tactically useful.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a motion to suppress a deposition in Louisiana?
It is the procedural tool for challenging a deposition, in whole or in part, on the ground that the officer mishandled its preparation, signing, certification, or filing.
What kinds of errors does Article 1456 cover?
Errors and irregularities in how the deposition was transcribed, prepared, signed, certified, sealed, endorsed, transmitted, or filed by the officer under Articles 1437 through 1449 — the handling of the deposition after testimony is taken, not the testimony itself.
How quickly must you move to suppress a deposition?
With reasonable promptness after the defect is discovered, or after it should have been discovered through due diligence. The article does not set a fixed deadline.