Art. 123.Forum Non Conveniens
Title I. Courts · Chapter 2. Venue · Last amended 2012 · Last verified July 30, 2026
Full Text of Art. 123
Amendment History
Added by Acts 1970, No. 294, §1; Acts 1988, No. 818, §1, eff. 7/18/1988; Acts 1999, No. 536, §1, eff. 6/30/1999; Acts 2012, No. 713, §1.
Plain-English Summary
Forum non conveniens is a doctrine that lets a court decline to keep a case, even though venue and jurisdiction are technically proper there, because another forum would serve the parties, the witnesses, and the interest of justice better. Article 123 builds this doctrine into two distinct tools. Subsection A lets a district court, on a contradictory motion or on its own motion after a contradictory hearing, transfer a civil case to another Louisiana district court where it might have been brought, for the convenience of the parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice. It draws one firm line: a suit filed in the parish where the plaintiff is domiciled, in a court that already has competent jurisdiction and proper venue, cannot be transferred under this article. For that purpose, the plaintiff's domicile is measured the same way Article 42 measures it for a defendant.
Subsection B goes further than a transfer between Louisiana courts — it allows outright dismissal, without prejudice, when the claim is predicated on acts or omissions that originated outside Louisiana and a more appropriate forum exists outside the state, considering where the underlying acts occurred, the convenience of the parties and witnesses, and the interest of justice. The same protection for plaintiffs applies here: a suit brought by a plaintiff domiciled in Louisiana, in a court of competent jurisdiction and proper venue, cannot be dismissed under this article.
Subsection C protects a plaintiff whose Louisiana suit is dismissed in favor of a foreign forum from losing the claim to prescription — Louisiana's civil-law term for the running of a legal deadline that extinguishes a claim, similar to what other states call a statute of limitations. Before dismissing, the court must require the defendant to waive any prescription defense that matured after the Louisiana suit was filed, so long as the plaintiff refiles in an appropriate foreign court within sixty days of the dismissal. That waiver becomes void if the refiling deadline is missed, and the court may also condition the dismissal on letting the plaintiff reinstate the same claim in Louisiana if the foreign forum turns out unable or unwilling to take the case.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is forum non conveniens?
A doctrine letting a court decline to keep a case, even though it has proper jurisdiction and venue, because another forum would better serve the parties, the witnesses, and the interest of justice.
Can a Louisiana court send my case to another state's court entirely?
Not by transfer — Article 123(A) only allows transfer between Louisiana district courts. But under subsection B, if the claim arises from conduct that originated outside Louisiana, the court can dismiss the suit without prejudice so it can be refiled in a more appropriate foreign forum.
Can a plaintiff who sues in his own home parish be sent elsewhere under this article?
No. Both subsections A and B expressly protect a plaintiff who sues in the parish of his own domicile, in a court that already has competent jurisdiction and proper venue, from being transferred or dismissed under Article 123.
What protects my claim if the court dismisses it in favor of another state's courts?
Article 123(C) requires the defendant to waive any prescription defense that matured after the Louisiana suit was filed, as long as you refile in an appropriate foreign court within sixty days of the dismissal. That waiver becomes void if you miss the sixty-day window.