K.S.A. 60-232.Use of depositions in court proceedings
Last amended July 1, 2010 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of K.S.A. 60-232
Amendment History
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-232; amended by Supreme Court order dated July 20, 1972; L. 1987, ch. 218, § 4; L. 1997, ch. 173, § 15; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 101; July 1.
Plain-English Summary
A deposition can't just be read into the record whenever a party wants. K.S.A. 60-232(a)(1) requires that the party against whom it's used was present, represented, or had reasonable notice of the deposition, that the testimony would be admissible under the rules of evidence if the deponent testified live, and that the use falls into one of the categories the rule lists. Any party can use a deposition to impeach or contradict a witness's testimony, and an adverse party can use for any purpose the deposition of a party or of an officer, director, managing agent, or organizational designee under K.S.A. 60-230(b)(6) or 60-231(a)(4).
The broadest category covers an unavailable witness. A deposition can be used for any purpose if the court finds the witness has died, is more than 100 miles away or out of state (unless the offering party procured that absence), can't attend because of age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment, couldn't be subpoenaed by the offering party, or if exceptional circumstances make it desirable in the interest of justice. A deposition lawfully taken in an earlier federal or state case, between the same parties or their successors and involving the same subject matter, can carry over into the later action to the same extent as if it had been taken there.
Subsection (c) gives a party the right, in a jury trial, to insist that deposition testimony offered for any purpose other than impeachment be presented in nontranscript form -- video or audio -- if it's available, unless the court finds good cause to do otherwise. And subsection (d) sets out a waiver scheme for objections: errors in the notice or the officer's qualifications have to be raised promptly or they're gone, objections to how the deposition was transcribed or certified require a prompt motion to suppress, but objections to a deponent's competence or to the relevance of testimony survive even without being raised during the deposition, unless the problem could have been fixed on the spot.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I use my opponent's deposition testimony at trial for any purpose?
An adverse party can use for any purpose the deposition of a party, or of that party's officer, director, managing agent, or organizational designee under K.S.A. 60-230(b)(6) or 60-231(a)(4). Depositions of other witnesses generally require showing unavailability or fit within one of the rule's other listed uses.
When can I use a nonparty witness's deposition instead of live testimony?
Subsection (a)(4) allows it if the court finds the witness has died, is more than 100 miles from the hearing or outside Kansas, can't attend due to age, illness, infirmity, or imprisonment, couldn't be subpoenaed by the offering party, or if exceptional circumstances make it desirable in the interest of justice.
Do I have to present deposition testimony as a written transcript at a jury trial?
No. Subsection (c) gives any party the right to insist that deposition testimony offered for a purpose other than impeachment be presented in nontranscript form, such as video, if it's available -- unless the court finds good cause to order otherwise.
What objections do I lose if I don't raise them during the deposition itself?
Subsection (d)(3)(B) waives objections to errors in the manner of taking the deposition, the form of a question or answer, the oath, or a party's conduct if they aren't raised at the time and could have been corrected then. Objections to a deponent's competence or to the relevance of testimony are not waived this way.
Can I use a deposition taken in an earlier lawsuit in my current case?
Subsection (a)(8) allows it if the deposition was lawfully taken (and filed, if required) in an earlier federal or state action involving the same subject matter and the same parties or their representatives or successors in interest.