K.S.A. 60-220.Permissive joinder of parties
Last amended July 1, 2010 · Last verified July 28, 2026
Full Text of K.S.A. 60-220
Amendment History
L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-220; amended by Supreme Court order dated July 17, 1969; L. 2010, ch. 135, § 87; July 1.
Plain-English Summary
Subsection (a)(1) lets multiple people join as plaintiffs in a single action if they assert a right to relief -- jointly, severally, or in the alternative -- arising out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, and if a question of law or fact common to all of them will come up in the case. Subsection (a)(2) mirrors that rule for defendants: several people can be joined as defendants if a right to relief is asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative arising from the same transaction or series, and a common question of law or fact will arise as to all of them.
Subsection (a)(3) makes clear that joinder doesn't force every plaintiff or defendant to have a stake in every piece of relief sought. Neither a plaintiff nor a defendant needs to be interested in obtaining or defending against all the relief demanded in the action, and the court can enter judgment for one or more plaintiffs according to what they're each entitled to, and against one or more defendants according to what each of them owes.
Subsection (b) gives the court a tool to manage the risk that comes with joining several parties together: it can issue orders, including separate trials, to protect a party from embarrassment, delay, expense, or other prejudice caused by including someone against whom that party asserts no claim and who asserts no claim against them.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can several plaintiffs sue the same defendant together in one Kansas lawsuit?
Yes, if subsection (a)(1)'s two conditions are met: the plaintiffs' rights to relief arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, and a question of law or fact common to all of them will arise in the case.
Do all defendants joined in one case have to be liable for the same amount?
No. Subsection (a)(3) states that neither a plaintiff nor a defendant has to be interested in all the relief demanded, and the court can enter judgment for particular plaintiffs and against particular defendants according to their own rights and liabilities.
What can I do if being joined with other defendants I have nothing to do with is unfair to me?
Subsection (b) lets the court issue protective orders, including ordering separate trials, to shield a party from embarrassment, delay, expense, or other prejudice caused by joinder with someone against whom that party has no claim and who has no claim against them.
What's required for defendants to be properly joined together under this rule?
Subsection (a)(2) requires that a right to relief be asserted against them jointly, severally, or in the alternative, arising from the same transaction, occurrence, or series, plus a common question of law or fact affecting all of them.
Does joinder under this rule require identical claims among all the plaintiffs?
No. Subsection (a)(1) allows plaintiffs to assert relief jointly, severally, or in the alternative, so their individual claims can differ as long as they arise from the same transaction or series and share a common question.